My first responcibility as GM. > Don't forget; the Milakanuri "resolve the succession" action was > a triple action that I didn't get the bonus for, which is the > difference between success and failure... > > That needs to be redone. I have read throgh it and the triple action was forgotten. A triple action is only a positive two thought. >Action II,III,IV: (Triple Action) Resolve the succession > >Tactical Action, internal >Actor: The Master Necrologist >Primary Determinant: Cultural orientation (traditional) > >Difficulty: Hard, perhaps Very Hard >Reaction: Heroic (This hasn't happened in a loooong time) >Secrecy: None >Modifiers: >- Uncertainty about Shanari >- Youth of Sharifu >+ Power holders want _a_ solution, and don't care as much who wins > >Results: >-- Disaster. The refused party avoids death, and has considerable >popular support. Civil war seems likely. >- The refused party is put to death, but popular support was for the >other candidate. The new Per-Aa's consent is decreased. >OR >The refused candidate escapes death, but has little popular support. >There will be problems, but no war. >0 Mixed results: The refused candidate is slain, but the populace is >sharply divided over the wisdom of the Master Necrologist's choice. >+ The choice is made, the refused candidate is slain, and the choice >has popular support. >++ (Assuming action I went well) - Khaatil's claim is proven false, >and he is burned ignominiously. Sharifu's claim to the throne is >cemented >and perhaps even strengthened. > >(My opinion is that Action 1 should determine whether or not Sharifu >or Khaatil is picked by the Master Necrologist. If results are mixed, >the GM or I can flip a coin or something.) > Result: -2 +2 -1 + (+1 0 -1 0)= -1 Failure Suggestion: Khaatil was but to death but he had the suport of populas. The current ruler is excepted but his consent is a -1. Jason Todd Heaps ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.
