On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Joel Elfman wrote:
>     Okay, let try it out.  I did not realize you were also still writing
> for Manund since it is listed as an independent NPS. I would have
> checked what we have been writing with you.
>     What do you think of making Asentinir its own NPS? or is that
> splitting the Eleven Cities too much?

I just keep wondering that if Manund (& Asentinir) are NPSs, who *does*
the actions for them? They are part of Eleven cities, so I thought that
since there's none else to keep their side in the conflict, I might do 
it as part of the routine. 

>     Remember the other members of the Council can also submit
> proposals/actions for Asentinir or for their forces in Asentinir.

Hmm... is that as in: 

 Taseleth action 1/4: manipulate through the council Asentinir into 
 granting exclusive trading rights to the Guild of...

or as in: 

 Asentinir action 1/4: a proposal is forth by Taseleth councillers to 
 grant exclusive trading rights to the Guild of...

Whichever the case, I'm sure it will work out.

>     One thought for 2842 was to have the Duchess of Manund appeal to the
> Regency Council and the first meeting of the Mythnir Council to appeal
> for aid to retake her Duchy from Merelbar but that is now up to you :-)

Ok.

>     If Manund is an independent NPS as listed is it part of your 4
> actions for the Eleven Cities or are you taking more?  And of course the
> same question applies to Asentinir if it becomes an independent NPS?

I'm taking only 4 actions, although some of them may be rather manysided.

>     The other alternative is since Manund no longer has a player it be
> absorbed back into the Eleven Cities and removed from the independent
> NPS list.  Let me know your ideas.

Maybe later.
 
juuso
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.