(see below)
M. Keaton
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juha Vesanto (Juuso)"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Qai] Do we still need a GM?
| On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Paul Corrish wrote:
| > Secondly, if we do still need a GM, I'm still prepared
| > to take on that role.
|
| Well, there's not been a single mail from Horganus since
| March 26th (upto which everything seemed to go fine), so
| I think it is safe to that: yes, we do need a GM.
|
Agreed. Horganus seems to have vanished.
| > Either way I'd like to play as Tanimbar, either this
| > or next turn (if it's viable this, otherwise next)
| > which the websites says is available, I won't vary it
| > from the website version except to correspond with any
| > secret information the previous GMs are previous to
| > and visitors to the site are not.
|
| Keaton, as the second GM, you have the final say on this,
| but I don't see any obstacles to this.
|
No problem. Part of the reason we keep me around as a second GM is so the
main can play if he wants too.
| > Just two more things: I'd like to make everything on
| > this list confidential to list members, but
| > displayable on website with poster permission. I'm
| > assuming I'm actually over stepping my authority -
| > Juha (did I finally get it right?),
|
| Yep.
|
| > can you authorise
| > this, since I think it ought to be done with Moderator
| > (i.e. your) Authority. This is in line with the fact
| > that some people explicitly state it in their
| > signatures, I feel it should be implied, although the
| > other part of most of those signatures.
|
| Hmmm... I'm not quite sure what you mean. The list is for
| members only, but people outside the list can read it
| through the web interface (at www.phoenyx.net). Filtering
| the web interface selectively for each member is not
| possible (with current administrative tools). Closing
| the web interface would also require special arrangements
| (and would be an inconvenience...).
|
| > By law I am not allowed to show political bias or
| > subscribe to any mailing list that shows such bias.
| > Therefore I'd like to make discussing politics a
| > two-strike offence. The first time, you get a warning,
| > the next time after the warning, you have to leave the
| > list until you can stop posting political message.
| > Again, I feel this is a decision for the Moderator.
|
| Well, that's fine by me. So far, there haven't been a
| single conversation on Real-World(!) politics on this list (IIRC),
| so I wouldn't expect(/welcome) such conversation in the future,
| either.
|
| juuso
The only political discussions we have had fall into two categories: either
historical examples to explain society actions (which is only marginally
political) and things such as the general outpouring of support following
the tragic events of 9/11 and the occasional passing mention of well-wishes
for Allied troops in the field (again, only marginally political, really
more simple expressions of humanity).
| ----------------------------------------------------------------
| To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.
