On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Ibrahim Dughlas-gani wrote: > I heartily agree, but it appears i am at a loss here. Well, truth to tell, so am I since I did *not* go back to the original posts and read them. Therefore I'm not passing judgement here, I'm only making observations based on recent posts. And the observation here is that player societies within player societies are very delicate things. Fortunately there are no disagreements (that I can see) of the state of affairs, just a wish that the actors and targets in the actions would be stated even more clearly. So, in the *future*, perhaps an alternate wording to any action could be suggested by anyone who feels their toes have been stepped upon? > At no point in time have I described the Republic as encompassing > Taltheran (not yet, anyway...). I've been pretty straight forward about > that from the start, i feel. At least I have never had that kind of impression. > lack thereof). Having said that, and knowing that I can be wordy on > occasions, apologies for any confusion that may have originated with me. Wordy is good, IMHO :) juuso ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.


