Home | Forum | Unread | Sign in | Sign in | Beta? | Wiki
The Phoenyx
your roleplaying community

games > celandra > main

Celandra is a game in which the players take the roles of societies, rather than playing individual characters. The players will invent a society with its culture and heritage, and will guide its development and interaction with the world. Emphasis will be be placed on developing a detailed history of Celandra, along with myths and legends.
Subscribe | Unread | Recent | Group options | Topic options | Post
AndrewJanssen
Andrew Janssen

Sun

Nov 30
2003

01:27

[Cel] Interesting Article on nation-states

--- RulingNations@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/24/03 2:02:40 AM Mountain Standard Time, 
> andrewdj54701@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> >I came across this nifty essay on the Net awhile back, about the
> seven 
> >signs of failed or failiing states. It's from the Spring '98 issue
> of 
> >PARAMETERS, which is the journal of the U.S. Army's War College. You
> can 
> read 
> >the whole thing at
> http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/98spring/
> >peters.htm, 
> 
> What a load of BS.  This article falls more under pro-american
> propaganda 
> than under real scholarship.  It doesn't define economic factors, it
> says that 
> America's education system is the best in the world, and doesn't
> account for 
> differences in population and culture.  I couldn't even finish
> reading this load 
> of garbage.

Read the whole thing, before you dismiss it. Yes, the author *is*
coming from a Western Cultural perspective, with all the baggage that
implies. Yes, his definition of a "successful" nation-state does define
success by how well a nation or culture competes on the global market.
Another assumption underlying the piece is, of course, globalization &
industrialization. In a world that's not undergoing globalization &
industrialization, most of Lt.Col. Peters' signs of failing states
aren't as relevant in the short term. But that, in my opinion, doesn't
in any way invalidate his points, particularily his last two: Any
society or culture that values neither education nor work will not be
able to compete successfully with societies that *do* place high values
on education and work.

I think that he raises a hypothesis that's worthy of examination,
perhaps from a less "American" perspective.

One other point: The author's evaluation of cultural "success" or
"failure" is not a moral judgement, it's more of a Darwinian judgement.
Successful societies spread their ways of doing things around the
globe, while failing societies must either change or implode.

You can agree with the article's opinion or not, but *don't* do the
author the disservice of dismissing him without finishing reading his
work.

Andrew
> Jefferson
> http://www.picotech.net/~jeff_wilson63/rpg/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.

Subject (required)




 
Refresh