Juha Vesanto wrote: > Jefferson wrote: >>Jason Heaps wrote: >> >>Why? I'd think she'd be pleased that more people were making use of >>magic. > > This is not generally true: more isn't always the same as good, even > if you really like about the thing you get "more" of. Good point. >>>Unless of course she was consulted and came to an agreement. (Which as >>>they way the listening currently stands proble would not happen since >>>in her mind someone who knows what they are talking about is not on the >>>lisencing group (some sort of mage/Sorcerer.) >> >>Since this was a decision by the mortals who run Exquaestio there's no >>way for her to be consulted. > > This is the way I see this. This licensing has nothing to do with > gods. The people who have bought the license have been practicing > magic anyway. Previously, they just didn't have a sheet of paper > saying they did it, and they had the good morale about it. > If I may decide it, Miracradsa regards the license stuff as political > or commercial stuff, a non-issue for her. But official Mir reaction > is naturally fundamentally political/commercial in nature. A natural > response from them is to put heavy pressure on Exquaestio to withdraw > their licensing scheme, because it is a competitor to Mir's own > "product". Yes. That's how I see it as well. Jefferson (Exquaestio) http://www.picotech.net/~jeff_wilson63/rpg/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.
