Jefferson wrote:
Juha Vesanto wrote:
> Jefferson wrote:
>>Jason Heaps wrote:
>>
>>Why? I'd think she'd be pleased that more people were making use of
>>magic.
>
> This is not generally true: more isn't always the same as good, even
> if you really like about the thing you get "more" of.
Good point.
>>>Unless of course she was consulted and came to an agreement. (Which as
>>>they way the listening currently stands proble would not happen since
>>>in her mind someone who knows what they are talking about is not on the
>>>lisencing group (some sort of mage/Sorcerer.)
>>
>>Since this was a decision by the mortals who run Exquaestio there's no
>>way for her to be consulted.
>
> This is the way I see this. This licensing has nothing to do with
> gods. The people who have bought the license have been practicing
> magic anyway. Previously, they just didn't have a sheet of paper
> saying they did it, and they had the good morale about it.
> If I may decide it, Miracradsa regards the license stuff as political
> or commercial stuff, a non-issue for her. But official Mir reaction
> is naturally fundamentally political/commercial in nature. A natural
> response from them is to put heavy pressure on Exquaestio to withdraw
> their licensing scheme, because it is a competitor to Mir's own
> "product".
Yes. That's how I see it as well.
I would agree with that
Another thing to remember though is that the Mirrish Sorcerers are Miracradsa priest as well.
I think and important thing to ask is do the Exquaestio reconize other organizations lisences. Because the way I understood is they don't.
Jason Heaps
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com ----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.
