Home | Forum | Unread | Sign in | Sign in | Beta? | Wiki
The Phoenyx
your roleplaying community

games > celandra > main

Celandra is a game in which the players take the roles of societies, rather than playing individual characters. The players will invent a society with its culture and heritage, and will guide its development and interaction with the world. Emphasis will be be placed on developing a detailed history of Celandra, along with myths and legends.
Subscribe | Unread | Recent | Group options | Topic options | Post
JasonHeaps
Jason Heaps

Wed

Aug 3
2005

22:41



Wikify

[Cel] Where are we in the turn cycle?

I am going to institue the rule that players can only uses 8 fudge points per player per year.

I am still thinking about Andrew suggestion.  I can see were he is comeing from in regards to not allowing players to always get Superb and Legendary success, but i also can understand about where a player would want to be able to use the fudge points were he wants to.
 
My though about it right now is that players can uses 8 fudge points for internal actions, were as a player can only uses 4 for external, this way a player can't force a legendary success when they are interacting with another country.  
 
Jason Heaps  
 


Andrew Janssen  wrote:Jefferson wrote:
> Andrew Janssen wrote:
> 
> 
>>I woudl go one step further and suggest a rule that the maximum number 
>>of fudge points for a single action be 4, with 8 being the total maximum 
>>per turn.
> 
> 
> Now this I _really_ object to. It says, "we're stacking the deck to 
> support people who know the game better." If this rule had been in effect 
> I would have never joined.
> 
> I wouldn't mind doing away with fudge points altogether, but restricting 
> _how they're spent_ is cliquish in the extreme.
> 

I don't understand your objection, Jeff. I had thought that there wasn't 
really much point in spending more than 4 points on an action, but 
perhaps I'm confused about the way fudge points work. (It might be that 
it makes the most sense to spend them in multiples of 4 . . .)

As for the 8 fp/turn limit, I think it's a question of game 
balancing--in fact, the 4 fp/action limit is also a game balance 
question. How easy do we want to make it to achieve successes of Suberb 
(+3), Legendary (+4) or more?

I disagree that limiting fudge point expenditures per turn would favor 
low participation. I certainly wouldn't reduce my contributions, anyway.

My opinion on this might also relate to the way I tend to spend fudge 
points: only one or two per action per turn--although I've spent 8 this 
turn. From what I've seen, you tend store up your fp's, and then spend 
them all at once, but that's just my impression.

Andrew
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com ----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.

Subject (required)




 
Refresh