On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 sjohn@io.com wrote:

>I'm not in one. I'm simply explaining myself. As you've said before, it is
>never accidental. I find your husband offensive. I find you needlessly
>DE-fensive.

Funny, a moment ago you were the picture of offended innocence.

>Lady, if you want my autograph, just write and ask, okay? No need to stalk
>me.

Heh.  Visiting Deja to confirm something is hardly "stalking."  You're
merely upset that your words can come back to haunt you.  If it bothers
you, use an x-no-archive.

>I wasn't being rude, then. I was being clear.

Oddly enough, many people find the implication that they have the "IQ of a
lizard or small household pet" rude.  Perhaps you're using a different
dictionary than the rest of us.

>If you wish to continue this, I suggest YOU stop being rude, and take it
>to private email where it belongs.

Oh, I'm merely being clear.

You say something in public, you should have the guts to stand by it in
public.  I do.



----------------------------------------------------------------
GMAST Home Page:  http://www.phoenyx.net/gmast/
Tech support questions go to support@phoenyx.net.