On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 mastercougar@juno.com wrote: > <rather than his design.>> > > Are you being this dense on purpose? Are you just trying to start a fight on purpose. Okay, you've disagreed with me... saying that just because the character is *good* at combat doesn't mean they're *oriented* toward combat. Now you've disagreed with Jason, who basically just said what I paraphrased above as your position. So maybe I've got your position wrong. But, if combat-oriented doesn't mean "better at combat than anything else" and it doesn't mean "combat-oriented in personal outlook", just what does it mean? I still maintain that Fizzik is a combat-oriented character, even if he never *trains* at combat. It's what he does best, it's what he's *employed* to do in the story he appears in. That he never trained in combat is of no consequence, in my opinion... he's still a combat-oriented character, both in design and in personal outlook. -- Carl D Cravens (raven@phoenyx.net) GMAST List Owner [ Trim Your Quotes! ] Error locating MAFIA.EXE - program not executed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- GMAST Home Page: http://www.phoenyx.net/gmast/
