From: "Michael Orton"> First of all I'd like to appologise for all the strife my original post > caused. > It didn't, IMHO. You made an unwise post, Jim responded fairly predictably, I pointed out that you were sailing into dangerous waters and both you and Jim stepped back (complicated by his accidental posting of the private reply to the list). Then there's... > Karen's observation was of the nature that the pot and the kettle are > equally black. > Which was fair comment. Then Jim bit her head off and she grew another one and bit back. At this point the conversation had very little to do with your original message. Jim stomped off in a huff and a stack of commentary on the behaviour arrived from on-lookers. All fairly run-of-the-mill for gmast in my experience. > I do not see how we get from that to Carl resigning. It certainy > seems a rather drastic response to me. > If I understand Carl this isn't particularly a response to the brief spitting match, he's just not attached enough to the position to take flak over it. Sounds fair to me. Chris Tutty ---------------------------------------------------------------- GMAST Home Page: http://www.phoenyx.net/gmast/


