On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, T. M. Neeck wrote:

> From: "Ola Ågren" 
>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, T. M. Neeck wrote:
>>
>>> [Seriously, that _is_ odd.  I wonder why that would be happening--I'm not
>>> doing anything exotic, unless this is one of those communities that
>>> considers Outlook Express exotic. {Yes, I'm THAT damn lazy.}]
>>
>> Outlook Express is (in)famous for not following standards... It is
>> probably because of a faulty "References:" or something like that this
>> time.

It is not "References:" that is missing; your mail lacks the
"In-Reply-To:" header and this is the most probable cause here.

>> As a side note, our SpamAssassin marks your mails as potential spam,
>> giving it a spam score of 6.913. It fails the following major tests:
>>  FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,
>
> Ironic, that.  I chose "br4v4d0" with the specific intent to _fend_off_
> spammers.  No wonder it works, they think I'm one of THEM...

*smiles*

The last two failed tests appears since the gamers' list processor strips 
the original "X-Mailer" and "X-MimeOLE" headers which then triggers these 
rules.

/Ola
--
Ola Ågren * corps@acc.umu.se * ola@cs.umu.se

General Preprocessing Perceptron -
 	How to put an awful lot of "knowledge" in a weighted sum.
----------------------------------------------------------------
GAMERS Home Page:  http://www.phoenyx.net/gamers/