Home | Forum | Unread | Sign in | Sign in | Beta? | Wiki
The Phoenyx
your roleplaying community

discussion > gamers > main

GAMERS is about roleplaying games (including sims) and almost anything of interest to the average roleplayer.
Subscribe | Unread | Recent | Group options | Topic options | Post
KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Mar 29
2006

03:23



Wikify

Gavilan

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Chuk Goodin wrote:

CG>(I've spent most of my gaming life torn between the cool fun character 
CG>building point by point, and the more flexible rules-light type of 
CG>systems. Supers is my favourite genre -- T&J hits an almost perfect sweet 
CG>spot for me personally. Plus it talks about Northrop Frye.)

Me too.  I like really detailed character generation systems (Champs, 
GURPS...) and then actual play mechanics that only serve to define what 
the character generation means, not to be used in actual play.  Heh.

The PowerPoint system, I suppose, would be more to give a presentation to 
the other players (and lurkers, and even the GM though you'd want to 
follow it with the details there) about what your character is, I think, 
than necessarily replacing whatever system you best like to define it.

It also defines (and this is very significant) what's important to you 
about your character, rather than what cost the most points.  Chris' first 
character in our supers game, for instance, was much discussed in Carl's 
blog... he was ridiculously wealthy.  But for Chris, this wasn't saying "I 
want my character to be a Bruce Wayne or Tony Stark kind of guy, with lots 
of complications arising from business competitors and stuff." He was 
saying "I don't want my character to have to deal with mundane concerns 
like money."

In the first case, you can take Wealthy tempered with Duty or Enemies or 
whatever, and in the second case, you take plain old Wealthy.  And that's 
fine for times when the player is saying "I want power without 
responsibility," but not so fine for when the player is just saying "I 
don't want to deal with this in this campaign, please."

I'm not sure how I'd sum up Magma in slideware, and whether Doesn't Have 
To Worry About Money would rate being a point, or whether it would be a 
genre assumption to say he doesn't have to worry unless it's part of his 
secret-identity point, though.

-- 
Karen J. Cravens  silver@phoenyx.net

----------------------------------------------------------------
GAMERS Home Page:  http://www.phoenyx.net/gamers/

Subject (required)




 
Refresh