Home | Forum | Unread | Sign in | Sign in | Beta? | Wiki
The Phoenyx
your roleplaying community

news > managers > main

Discussion, mostly technical, about running Phoenyx groups goes here. Hypotheticals and wishlists go in stakeholders.
Subscribe | Unread | Recent | Group options | Topic options | Post
CarlCravens
Carl D Cravens

Mon

Apr 24
2000

14:24

Do-better - an Intelligence test?

Okay, I have a question for y'all.  Some of you are familiar with my "do
better" form letter... for those who aren't, it's a "here's what we
expected from you on your application, please try again."  (If you'd like
to see it, let me know and I'll send it to you.) 

Every once in awhile, I get someone who replies back (often quoting the
entire thing) and says, "I'm not sure what you're saying here... are you
asking me to do something?  Have I been accepted?"

I believe the form letter is rather clear on this point... it specifically
asks for more info.  "...please take the time to give us a little more
detail about your game..."  It goes into detail about *what* I want to
see. 

My question is, am I being unfair if I automatically reject applications
when someone responds to the form letter in this way?  Is it fair to
assume that if a prospective GM can't understand the form letter, or maybe
worse, doesn't bother to read it for details, that they aren't going to
make a good GM?  The form letter is long... 686 words, 66 lines of
text.  But if someone can't read and understand the form letter despite
its length, how can I expect them to run a good game when that takes a lot
of time and attention?  

(I have another prospective GM that shows promise in her ideas... but she
takes a week to reply to every message.  I'm on the verge of rejecting her
based entirely on how slow she is to reply to simple requests for
info... I'm afraid that her game would bog down and die from lack of GM
responsiveness.) 

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners


Subject (required)




 
Refresh