
checking to see if it works yet. No need to respond
On 08/06/02 at 06:28 PM, Earl F Hamptonsaid: >checking to see if it works yet. Yay!!! >No need to respond You bet there's a reason to respond!!! What, if anything, did you do? I asked on the phoenyx managers list, but haven't seen a reply yet. Maybe Karen Cravens did something? Well, IAC, received!!! Eris -- ----------------------------------------------------------- "Eris Reddoch" using MR/2 ICE #245 http://www.crosswinds.net/~erisr -----------------------------------------------------------
On Tuesday 06 August 2002 04:37 pm, you wrote: > On 08/06/02 at 06:28 PM, Earl F Hamptonsaid: > >checking to see if it works yet. > > Yay!!! > > >No need to respond > > You bet there's a reason to respond!!! > > What, if anything, did you do? I asked on the phoenyx managers list, > but haven't seen a reply yet. Maybe Karen Cravens did something? No they didn't do anything. I wrote a little script to rewrite my headers so that it doesn't look like a relay was done. Now anything going out looks like it went client -> isp rather than client ->exim behind firewall-> exim allowed to connect->isp relay > > Well, IAC, received!!! I guess it was looking like spam to them because dhs.org started charging for a name so mine went bad (ie I didn't pay to keep it). Theu must block any thing without an mx or maybe just dns. > > Eris
On 08/06/02 at 10:32 PM, Earl F Hamptonsaid: >> What, if anything, did you do? I asked on the phoenyx managers list, >> but haven't seen a reply yet. Maybe Karen Cravens did something? >No they didn't do anything. I wrote a little script to rewrite my >headers so that it doesn't look like a relay was done. Now anything >going out looks like it went client -> isp rather than client ->exim >behind firewall-> exim allowed to connect->isp relay I finally got a reply back from Karen. She said she hadn't done anything, asked if you were getting bounces. >> Well, IAC, received!!! >I guess it was looking like spam to them because dhs.org started >charging for a name so mine went bad (ie I didn't pay to keep it). >Theu must block any thing without an mx or maybe just dns. That's possible. I know they are very spam conscious, and have problems with both harvesters and spammers hitting the lists they host. I'll pass along what you did, just in case something like this bites anyone else they have on their lists. I'm just glad you're getting through now. Eris AKU GM -- ----------------------------------------------------------- "Eris Reddoch" using MR/2 ICE #245 http://www.crosswinds.net/~erisr -----------------------------------------------------------
On Tuesday 06 August 2002 08:40 pm, you wrote: > On 08/06/02 at 10:32 PM, Earl F Hamptonsaid: > >> What, if anything, did you do? I asked on the phoenyx managers list, > >> but haven't seen a reply yet. Maybe Karen Cravens did something? > > > >No they didn't do anything. I wrote a little script to rewrite my > >headers so that it doesn't look like a relay was done. Now anything > >going out looks like it went client -> isp rather than client ->exim > >behind firewall-> exim allowed to connect->isp relay > > I finally got a reply back from Karen. She said she hadn't done > anything, asked if you were getting bounces. No I wasn't getting bounces. Maybe they are bounceing to the first Recieved: or Sender: rather than the From or Reply-to > > >> Well, IAC, received!!! > > > >I guess it was looking like spam to them because dhs.org started > >charging for a name so mine went bad (ie I didn't pay to keep it). > >Theu must block any thing without an mx or maybe just dns. > > That's possible. I know they are very spam conscious, and have > problems with both harvesters and spammers hitting the lists they > host. I'll pass along what you did, just in case something like this > bites anyone else they have on their lists. > > I'm just glad you're getting through now. > > Eris > AKU GM