My first responcibility as GM.
> Don't forget; the Milakanuri "resolve the succession" action was
> a triple action that I didn't get the bonus for, which is the
> difference between success and failure...
>
> That needs to be redone.
I have read throgh it and the triple action was forgotten. A triple
action is
only a positive two thought.
>Action II,III,IV: (Triple Action) Resolve the succession
>
>Tactical Action, internal
>Actor: The Master Necrologist
>Primary Determinant: Cultural orientation (traditional)
>
>Difficulty: Hard, perhaps Very Hard
>Reaction: Heroic (This hasn't happened in a loooong time)
>Secrecy: None
>Modifiers:
>- Uncertainty about Shanari
>- Youth of Sharifu
>+ Power holders want _a_ solution, and don't care as much who wins
>
>Results:
>-- Disaster. The refused party avoids death, and has considerable
>popular support. Civil war seems likely.
>- The refused party is put to death, but popular support was for the
>other candidate. The new Per-Aa's consent is decreased.
>OR
>The refused candidate escapes death, but has little popular support.
>There will be problems, but no war.
>0 Mixed results: The refused candidate is slain, but the populace is
>sharply divided over the wisdom of the Master Necrologist's choice.
>+ The choice is made, the refused candidate is slain, and the choice
>has popular support.
>++ (Assuming action I went well) - Khaatil's claim is proven false,
>and he is burned ignominiously. Sharifu's claim to the throne is
>cemented
>and perhaps even strengthened.
>
>(My opinion is that Action 1 should determine whether or not Sharifu
>or Khaatil is picked by the Master Necrologist. If results are mixed,
>the GM or I can flip a coin or something.)
>
Result: -2 +2 -1 + (+1 0 -1 0)= -1 Failure
Suggestion: Khaatil was but to death but he had the suport of populas.
The
current ruler is excepted but his consent is a -1.
Jason Todd Heaps
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to celandra-off@phoenyx.net.
