Fudge RPG - Webzine: Volunteer

Important! This is an archived mailing list. Subscription information included in any messages is no longer current. Over the years, addresses and websites have changed. Follow offsite links at your own risk.


From: BrettRitter

Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:30:34 GMT

Subject: Webzine: Volunteer


After due reflection over this weekend and the last few days, I've decided
I'm very interested in seeing this project moving forward.

So much so, that I'm offering to coordinate soliciting and gathering
articles, and compiling them into issues, along with basic editing and
cohesion tasks.

This is a difficult thing to do, because I don't want to sound arrogant,
while it is actually an action that _is_ arrogant :)

Basically, I'm saying that I have the interest and the time available to
devote to this.  Anyone who feels they can and will do a better job is
welcome to step forward: I'm more interested in seeing this happen than in
stroking my ego.

What I see as a feasible goal is:

1) publish an "issue" based web 'zine.  Exact format can be hashed out
later--I'd prefer either HTML or PDF (or both), with a stronger leaning
towards HTML.

2) Given the numbers of volunteers that have come forth, I'm guessing that
we can't realistically expect more than a monthly issue of roughly 5
articles (depending on length).  Success can bring in more writers, and I
see regular issues as more important that issue size at this point.

3) Following the experiences I've seen with TSS, Pyramid, and JTAS, I'm
thinking we can develop a number of top level categories that submitters
can submit into:  Thus, even without regular columnists (and I'd love to
get a few of those, but that's an issue of development) readers can get a
sense of consistency.  Both Pyramid and TSS are Origin Award Nominees, so
they seem like good models to imitate.

If everyone is happy to let me take on the task of assembling, we should
iron out the ideas above and start working on submissions.  If not, those
objecting should bring their cases forward. :)


-- -----------------------------------------------
The Fudge List FAQ is at http://fudge.phoenyx.net/
** Don't start deliberately off-topic threads. ** 

SequenceFirst LineUsernameDate
0 After due reflection over this weekend and the last few days, I've decided I'm very interested in seeing this project moving forward. BrettRitter 2001-06-26 17:30:34
1 If I am adding a character description to an article is it OK to use the attributes and skills from "Fantasy Fudge"? Mitchw 2001-06-28 21:49:21
2 One question: the cost to a writer in terms of time and money? JohnStrain 2001-06-26 19:52:52
3 Sorry, but I couldn't resist trying to come up with a few 'zine names. Here are some of my ideas: Fudgezine - Fudge + Magazine... DanielDavis 2001-06-26 20:49:03
4 to it): > > Fudge Sundae > Fudge'Zine > > Go ahead! BrettRitter 2001-06-26 20:33:13
5 choose what fudge rules and add-ons we use so.... JimDickinson 2001-06-26 22:39:21
6 changes > based on the amount of content... BrettRitter 2001-06-27 04:20:41
7 those who volunteered to write have no > objections, it looks like I have a job. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 03:17:10
8 make a > > decision. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 17:07:13
9 long as you're open to involving others in the > > management. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 16:07:57
10 I'd be willing to write a regular once-per-month column on settings. -Mark On Tuesday 26 June 2001 03:48 pm, you wrote: > Since it looks like most of those who volunteered to write have no > objections, it looks like I have a job. MarkCChuCarroll 2001-06-27 12:32:41
11 Everyone > > should offer their opinion, and I'll listen. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 18:25:39
12 Hi, I fell off the edge of the world a while back. RohanLight 2001-06-27 20:07:44
13 agree with it being free. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-27 20:16:20
14 volunteered to write "a few articles a year", but you > haven't said any of those would be for our first articles. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 19:44:15
15 decisions that the group hasn't made by > general consensus, I'll know what you're worried about. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 19:28:59
16 *don't* want anyone else involved? CarlCravens 2001-06-27 17:55:59
17 entire > newsgroup heirarchies, multiple print magazines, and mailing lists with > hundreds of members supporting the community? BrettRitter 2001-06-27 22:31:21
18 and > declared it to be a group-run project. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 20:24:29
19 I am good at concepts but notoriously bad at translating my ideas into finished products (articles, source books, etc.) But if I do manage to write down something I think is coherent then I would like to know that one individual has the final Mitchw 2001-06-27 18:54:05
20 From: Brett Sanger >I've seen a lot of projects die because there was too much talk about the >project and not enough code being written. I've been pushing for >articles, and I've tried to resolve minor issues (such as the name), but >you need TnbaGwell 2001-06-27 21:10:30
21 into this and having someone steal the ball and > run willy-nilly over the horizon with it is annoying. JohnMorrow 2001-06-28 03:04:18
22 the opinions are in, someone > needs to make a decision. DrIanMcDonald 2001-06-27 23:22:30
23 I think this argument is getting a bit personal... MarkCChuCarroll 2001-06-28 14:15:45
24 when > the first issue is, so I can't give an answer. BrettRitter 2001-06-28 18:41:18
25 of readers... AdamJ 2001-06-28 18:39:24
26 a bad rep. CarlCravens 2001-06-28 21:31:27
27 My thoughts: > Fiction (Gamer fiction has a bad rep. BrettRitter 2001-06-28 21:45:04
28 Something I think could be handled on a case-by-case basis. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-28 23:51:27
29 legalities only, IMHO. CarlCravens 2001-06-29 03:06:39
30 needs to be a decision. WoEd 2001-06-29 03:22:39
31 effectively as a > > "benevolent dictatorship". DrIanMcDonald 2001-06-28 21:33:36
32 agree. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-29 13:08:17
33 quickly > > I expect to finalize everything by Friday, and start collecting articles > for the first issue. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 03:19:48
34 Also throwing in my $0.02 worth... SpalLino 2001-06-30 15:52:45
35 course...but good (and GOOD for that matter ) is > subjective. CarlCravens 2001-06-30 15:06:26
36 [mailto:fudge-error@phoenyx.net]On Behalf Of Brett Sanger Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:05 PM To: fudge@phoenyx.net Subject: FUDGE: Webzine: Open Issues >Fiction (Gamer fiction has a bad rep. LonSarver 2001-07-01 21:12:00
37 also a father the concept of propogating > this [expletive deleted] - "blood OK, sex taboo policy." is bogus. CarlCravens 2001-07-02 16:19:58
38 In a message dated 06/28/2001 10:00:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, morrow@io.com writes: > > _Titanic_ was PG-13 and included nudity and a sex scene. MalaGigi 2001-06-29 14:09:45
39 From: "Lon Sarver" >> Is it just me, or is anyone else disturbed by the standard that it's more >> acceptable to show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their >> genitals? JimDickinson 2001-07-03 03:51:34
40 No it isnt just you, and I am also a father the concept of propogating I am > > also an Artist and the word boycott springs to mind. LanceDyas 2001-07-03 05:37:12
41 some criteria as to what is and isn't a > suitable article at the start, even if it is just a broad stroke such > as "no porn, no excessive violence, etc'. CarlCravens 2001-07-03 14:05:10
42 will submit > "The Erotic Adventures of Miss Betty Herschel Amoung > the Midgets of Mars" as a campaign setting, and even > less likely that it... LAPArcilla 2001-07-03 11:39:23
43 submission "unacceptable" before being faced with a >_single_ questionable submission, or even enough submissions >to make one magazine? JasonAnderson 2001-07-03 05:53:26
44 I'm beginning to find some of these discussions of hypothetical editorial situations to be quite silly. SgRay 2001-07-02 21:32:43
45 "no nudity" is to not > drive off people who dislike nudity, Which was the original reason given. CarlCravens 2001-07-02 20:47:01
46 agreement, but legally, there's a big difference > between "potentially porn" and "potentially evil". WoEd 2001-07-02 20:42:33
47 father the concept of propogating > > this [expletive deleted] - "blood OK, sex taboo policy." is bogus. WoEd 2001-07-02 20:28:16
48 anyone else disturbed by the standard that it's more > acceptable to show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their > genitals? Yes, I think there should be more nudity and less prudish attitudes. The really odd thing is that it bugs WoEd 2001-07-02 20:21:08
49 risking > > some 12-year-old's mom accusing us of feeding porn to her son? BrettRitter 2001-07-02 19:48:49
50 artiste sensibilities are offended by your work having been > edited, you'll either have to get over it or give up on writing. WoEd 2001-07-02 19:42:56
51 better in > this example and I don't mean simple things like spelling or obvious grammar > mistakes as opposed to stylized grammar changes) and then I go out and > publish it myself with the editors changes. Technically and legally I > believe BrettRitter 2001-07-02 19:11:24
52 this is pretty commonly done. WoEd 2001-07-02 19:01:52
53 Well I'm from the "hate cookies, and know why they are important - sometimes", and Polls are def in the category rather than not in. ----- Original Message ----- From: Shawn McMahon on Monday, July 02, 2001 6:55 AM wrote > > Using cookies will JohnStrain 2001-07-02 18:00:30
54 be just as happy without artwork (but with a nice > graphic design to the zine's website) as with. CarlCravens 2001-07-02 13:48:53
55 Policies that attempt to "offend no-one" are a summary waste of time obviously. LanceDyas 2001-07-02 13:34:11
56 No it isnt just you, and I am also a father the concept of propogating this [expletive deleted] - "blood OK, sex taboo policy." is bogus. LanceDyas 2001-07-02 13:23:38
57 just me, or is anyone else disturbed by the standard that it's more > acceptable to show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their arrested for one than the other. ShawnMcMahon 2001-07-02 12:19:04
58 This brings up a technical issue... ShawnMcMahon 2001-07-02 11:55:56
59 From: "Lon Sarver" > Is it just me, or is anyone else disturbed by the standard that it's more > acceptable to show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their > genitals? GhostGames 2001-07-02 11:47:07
60 point out that I have no professional editing > experience, nor am I an English nerd, so take all of this with the > appropriate amount of salt. CarlCravens 2001-07-01 14:06:17
61 subjective. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-30 22:00:11
62 (IP issues) > >The law raises its ugly head once again. AdamJ 2001-06-30 16:27:49
63 idea of polls. SpalLino 2001-06-30 15:56:46
64 bad rep. JweLls 2001-06-30 12:06:31
65 "quality?" Those > > are my concerns. BillHamilton 2001-06-30 05:14:30
66 Enough people want > this to happen for us not to fear losing momentum, and more time to > consider want we want to do wouldn't hurt. DhobErman 2001-06-29 22:37:25
67 Actually, I think this is going a little too quickly. DrIanMcDonald 2001-06-29 22:06:24
68 for style and what is "quality?" Those > are my concerns. CarlCravens 2001-06-29 21:48:53
69 realistic). ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-29 12:57:21
70 it's amateur press, in the sense of amateur press alliance. WoEd 2001-06-29 03:43:41
71 I missed your declaration) > (I'm not holding anyone to these, just getting an estimate) > jwells@netten.net (short article every other month) > spallinoaj@dp.net (depending on content) > raven@phoenyx.net (a few articles a year) > jason_ga@so SpalLino 2001-06-29 03:19:04
72 all" nature of Fudge, I think the zine should > maintain a "family friendly" tone. JohnMorrow 2001-06-29 03:18:13
73 able >to evaluate the quality of the conversion if none are familiar with the >system in question. JasonAnderson 2001-06-29 02:58:13
74 fiction has a bad rep. WoEd 2001-06-29 02:52:43
75 conversions (IP issues) > > My suggestion (since this will apply to me in an article I'm thinking > of doing) is for the writer to get permission from the relevant > company first. CarlCravens 2001-06-29 02:46:24
76 my hard disk or print out. ThomasBagwell 2001-06-29 01:23:03
77 don't.) I don't have a real problem with this, but I'm fairly tolerant of such things. JasonAnderson 2001-06-29 00:23:00
78 various >> types of articles in order to publish? JasonAnderson 2001-06-29 00:15:48
79 I've "Rational and level-headed"? BrettRitter 2001-06-28 21:49:02
80 level-headed"? CarlCravens 2001-06-28 21:56:57
81 don't.) I would say yes only for fiction that supports a specific character or setting that is also included in the same issue. Mitchw 2001-06-28 21:44:30
82 editors > time to get geared up, we have to get organized and a web-site designed > and built. BrettRitter 2001-06-28 20:50:41
83 EXCEPT that I disagree about the back-end. CarlCravens 2001-06-28 21:12:21
84 editors/managers - not the whole list, >> not even the whole set of contributors (but perhaps elected by the list >> or the contributors?) - a small group, which coordinates through >> email to make decisions for the zine. ScottBBarrie 2001-06-28 20:41:52
85 you have > enough before then, great. BrettRitter 2001-06-28 19:24:48
86 "benevolent dictator" model won't work for > a community effort like this. WoEd 2001-06-28 16:33:52
87 opinions are in, someone > > needs to make a decision. WoEd 2001-06-28 16:10:05
88 has been much closer to two-three issues a > year for the last two years. CarlCravens 2001-06-28 14:35:05
89 Rohan, your mission , should you accept it. JohnStrain 2001-06-28 05:25:46
90 I am "good at concepts" as well, Mitch. JohnStrain 2001-06-28 04:59:39
91 wholly owned by Mark Imbriaco, and hosted > > by the company he co-owns; HTML.com. LanceDyas 2001-06-28 04:57:18
92 less than stellar regularity, but that hasn't >> stopped it from becoming more successful with time. AdamJ 2001-06-27 23:06:23
93 there are unknowns in any situation, and we could >play this game all day long, so there's not much point to it. AdamJ 2001-06-27 22:56:43
94 few? CarlCravens 2001-06-27 22:22:22
95 Hi, how about this: Brett is deemed provisional 'Project Manager' for the initialisation of the FUDGE webzine concept. RohanLight 2001-06-27 20:40:58
96 worse at > > generating repeat traffic. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 20:32:58
97 chaotic. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 20:05:22
98 over 7 years now, and even with the recent > downturn and dot coms going out of business left right and center, HTML.com > is still profitable and has a stable and growing customer base. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 19:58:56
99 asked for input and has seemed to go for the > > majority decision in every case so far. SgRay 2001-06-27 19:52:30
100 We've got a rudementary disaster recovery plan and we maintain off-site > backups. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-27 16:28:18
101 "issue"? CarlCravens 2001-06-27 16:08:35
102 down, there's a good chance the Phoenyx doesn't > rise from the ashes for quite some time. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 16:08:10
103 month, > to start. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 14:35:34
104 Yes, for hosting the zine I think my vote would have to go to > Phoenyx. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-27 14:14:18
105 In a message dated 06/26/2001 1:34:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, swiftone@alumni.psu.edu writes: > > How about "Fudging It"? MalaGigi 2001-06-27 13:37:12
106 June 26, 2001 11:19 PM Subject: Re: FUDGE: Webzine: FUDGE: Webzine > > We need someone to design the look-and-feel of the site. EdwardWedig 2001-06-27 11:15:00
107 compliant browser out there. LanceDyas 2001-06-27 06:30:17
108 to debate] > > The Fudge Factor? WoEd 2001-06-27 03:52:29
109 then let the list roast it :) Form follows > function, so some elements will depend on the size of each issue, which in > turn will depend on the material submitted. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 03:32:49
110 promote Fudge by writing Fudge articles for other > zines and magazines? CarlCravens 2001-06-27 03:25:14
111 6,000 words/issue. JasonAnderson 2001-06-27 02:37:42
112 to debate] > No ideas presented so far, aside from discarding "The Hypothetical Zine" > (which does have a wistful appeal) F.I.R.S.T. Fudge Internet Roleplaying Society Tastes (or Tales or Themes :-) Other than that I like the idea of somethin WoEd 2001-06-27 02:28:04
113 Add me to writer status: on request article not to exceed 4000 words John Strain missingjn@dixie-net.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Brett Sanger To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:48 PM Subject: FUDGE: Webzine: Zine Status > Since it l JohnStrain 2001-06-26 22:45:25
114 folk to > > Fudge. SharonTripp 2001-06-26 22:30:23
115 up being a weekly zine, Fudge Sunday. SharonTripp 2001-06-26 22:28:35
116 Would we do more to promote Fudge by writing Fudge articles for other them published. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-26 22:00:53
117 we might attract new folk to > Fudge. DrIanMcDonald 2001-06-26 21:19:44
118 Magazine... JohnMorrow 2001-06-26 21:01:40
119 Considering I'm but a lurker who likes to write, I'd love to write something for this project. GmtcaCkler 2001-06-26 20:58:32
120 On 06/26/01 at 01:45 PM, John Morrow said: >Some off-the-cuff suggestions for categories? ErisReddoch 2001-06-26 20:29:27
121 On 06/26/01 at 01:43 PM, Carl D Cravens said: >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 sgray@sudval.org wrote: >> My vote is for HTML. ErisReddoch 2001-06-26 20:16:36
122 guide (v. JohnMorrow 2001-06-26 19:21:43
123 [mailto:morrow@fnord.io.com] >I'll agree with votes for HTML put forward so far. MatthewsonKent 2001-06-26 18:55:31
124 Particularly if you keep the HTML > lynx-friendly (no frames, no tables, no java, avoid > imagemaps, all images with "alt" tags). CarlCravens 2001-06-26 18:43:36
125 web 'zine. SgRay 2001-06-26 18:13:35
126 reflection over this weekend and the last few days, I've decided > I'm very interested in seeing this project moving forward. WoEd 2001-06-26 17:55:02
127 the sarcasm didnt quite come out, You're right... CarlCravens 2001-07-03 14:00:47
128 ratings might be good, *if* we can come up with a suitable > rating system. WoEd 2001-07-02 19:48:57
129 about a country that just made child pornography illegal 3 > years ago. WoEd 2001-07-02 19:07:50
130 I'm beginning to think it's time to take the organizational issues private > to the leadership team and let the community judge our efforts instead of > judging us on speculation. ShawnMcMahon 2001-07-02 16:29:14
131 else disturbed by the standard that it's more > acceptable to show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their > genitals? CarlCravens 2001-07-02 00:44:45
132 the standard that it's more > acceptable to show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their > genitals? DrIanMcDonald 2001-07-01 22:58:26
133 [mailto:fudge-error@phoenyx.net]On Behalf Of woed Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 7:53 PM To: fudge@phoenyx.net Subject: Re: FUDGE: Webzine: Open Issues Ryan wrote: > Art > >All we can get, but where is the line drawn with regards to nudity/sexu LonSarver 2001-07-01 21:04:08
134 They can be a lot of fun and very interesting to > read. CarlCravens 2001-07-01 20:03:13
135 On 06/30/01 at 07:06 AM, Jonathan Wells said: >At 04:05 PM 6/28/01 -0500, you wrote: >>Fiction (Gamer fiction has a bad rep. ErisReddoch 2001-06-30 14:23:42
136 I third the motion. JohnStrain 2001-06-29 05:05:28
137 a bad rep. BillHamilton 2001-06-29 05:04:45
138 technically in a global market, what is > PG-13? JohnMorrow 2001-06-29 04:59:45
139 ceases to be > > an amateur press. BrettRitter 2001-06-29 03:50:56
140 These are some topics that will need to be decided that haven't really come up. BrettRitter 2001-06-28 21:05:09
141 set a target date of one month from today? CarlCravens 2001-06-28 20:45:11
142 to how many articles >we'll have. TnbaGwell 2001-06-28 19:16:03
143 me know, just as the call for articles said. CarlCravens 2001-06-28 18:02:00
144 and having someone steal the ball and > > run willy-nilly over the horizon with it is annoying. WoEd 2001-06-28 16:28:41
145 wholly owned by Mark Imbriaco, and hosted > by the company he co-owns; HTML.com. JohnMorrow 2001-06-28 03:07:20
146 I'd say that's >> one of the major determining factors, since the rest of the specs and >> features available look mostly the same. AdamJ 2001-06-28 02:52:41
147 the 'net does Phoenyx have? JohnMorrow 2001-06-28 01:44:05
148 I'm part of several small communities of less than 5000 members (and perhaps a rival government or two in exile). SgRay 2001-06-28 00:48:45
149 Just > what are you expecting here? BrettRitter 2001-06-27 20:23:05
150 if anyone doesn't LIKE your style, > nothing is stopping him/her from making her/his own zine. CarlCravens 2001-06-27 20:02:48
151 debate] >> raven@phoenyx.net has offered space on Phoenyx. AdamJ 2001-06-27 18:56:33
152 doesn't mean > he will. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 18:44:33
153 were a > bad thing. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 17:27:53
154 record. WoEd 2001-06-27 18:33:50
155 In a message dated 06/27/2001 9:09:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, raven@phoenyx.net writes: > Which means the day of the week you update will keep moving. MalaGigi 2001-06-27 16:46:18
156 (I think this was directed at me.) > > You can add me to the list of volunteers. EdwardWedig 2001-06-27 15:29:02
157 content, > but chock full of useful bits for the average gamer. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 14:40:01
158 June 26, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: FUDGE: Webzine: Zine Status > > 2) Volunteers to tap [Always open] > (Speak up if your willing or if I missed your declaration) > (I'm not holding anyone to these, just getting an estimate) > jwells@netten.net (s EdwardWedig 2001-06-27 11:10:43
159 is supposedly fully compliant with the >current HTML standard. JweLls 2001-06-27 06:05:04
160 lynx-friendly (no frames, no tables, no java, avoid > >> imagemaps, all images with "alt" tags). BillHamilton 2001-06-27 05:20:52
161 disclaimer at the start of every article. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 04:36:12
162 each >article. JasonAnderson 2001-06-27 04:32:01
163 the > management. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 04:18:43
164 our >private funds. JasonAnderson 2001-06-27 03:33:13
165 necessarily > the person who will do the day-to-day coding of HTML. Are you wanting to > do that or will we need to recruit a volunteer. I'll take a stab at it, then let the list roast it :) Form follows function, so some elements will depend BrettRitter 2001-06-27 03:24:46
166 system already on my side (Template::Toolkit). CarlCravens 2001-06-27 02:57:21
167 It's Got my vote:) John strain ----- Original Message ----- From: Jonathan Wells To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:59 PM Subject: Re: FUDGE: Webzine: Name-Foo! JohnStrain 2001-06-26 22:52:29
168 but I couldn't resist trying to come up with a few 'zine names. Mitchw 2001-06-26 22:27:01
169 I support pdf as well as html. ShawnMcMahon 2001-06-26 21:59:18
170 logo for those titles... DanielDavis 2001-06-26 21:15:38
171 Fudge E-zine") Now this I like. JweLls 2001-06-26 20:59:37
172 catagories do you have in mind? BrettRitter 2001-06-26 20:31:17
173 No ideas presented so far, aside from discarding "The Hypothetical Zine" > (which does have a wistful appeal) To put a couple on the table (again, I'm not particularly attached to it): Fudge Sundae Fudge'Zine Go ahead! JohnMorrow 2001-06-26 20:06:13
174 Since it looks like most of those who volunteered to write have no objections, it looks like I have a job. BrettRitter 2001-06-26 19:48:36
175 thing to do, because I don't want to sound arrogant, >> while it is actually an action that _is_ arrogant :) > >At the risk of sounding arrogant myself, I'm going to put forth the >Phoenyx as being an ideal place to host this. AdamJ 2001-06-26 19:36:50
176 offering to coordinate soliciting and gathering > articles, and compiling them into issues, along with basic editing and > cohesion tasks. JohnMorrow 2001-06-26 18:45:07
177 to do, because I don't want to sound arrogant, > while it is actually an action that _is_ arrogant :) At the risk of sounding arrogant myself, I'm going to put forth the Phoenyx as being an ideal place to host this. CarlCravens 2001-06-26 18:39:44
178 publish it or > sell it if an editor has touched it. BrettRitter 2001-06-29 03:53:26
179 with you _and_ the majority disagrees with you, as > the man on the ground I hope that you will do things your > own way that take into account: While I'm all for job satisfaction, the only reason I can foresee bucking the community is if the BrettRitter 2001-06-27 20:09:39
180 (I broke the messages up to cover different issues) > Getting stuck on one article doesn't stop me from writing > others. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 18:32:54
181 bit, but the ability to define my own plugins won me over to Toolkit. Either way it's the same basic concept. BrettRitter 2001-06-27 04:51:20
182 logo for those titles... BrettRitter 2001-06-26 21:23:25
183 Regardless of how big the issue is going to be, I'm going to need articles. BrettRitter 2001-06-26 20:16:25
184 Friday, and start collecting articles for the first issue. BrettRitter 2001-06-26 19:57:19
185 The > editor would submit formatted articles with a web-utility and generate the > pages from templates. BrettRitter 2001-06-26 19:32:47