After due reflection over this weekend and the last few days, I've decided
I'm very interested in seeing this project moving forward.
So much so, that I'm offering to coordinate soliciting and gathering
articles, and compiling them into issues, along with basic editing and
cohesion tasks.
This is a difficult thing to do, because I don't want to sound arrogant,
while it is actually an action that _is_ arrogant :)
Basically, I'm saying that I have the interest and the time available to
devote to this. Anyone who feels they can and will do a better job is
welcome to step forward: I'm more interested in seeing this happen than in
stroking my ego.
What I see as a feasible goal is:
1) publish an "issue" based web 'zine. Exact format can be hashed out
later--I'd prefer either HTML or PDF (or both), with a stronger leaning
towards HTML.
2) Given the numbers of volunteers that have come forth, I'm guessing that
we can't realistically expect more than a monthly issue of roughly 5
articles (depending on length). Success can bring in more writers, and I
see regular issues as more important that issue size at this point.
3) Following the experiences I've seen with TSS, Pyramid, and JTAS, I'm
thinking we can develop a number of top level categories that submitters
can submit into: Thus, even without regular columnists (and I'd love to
get a few of those, but that's an issue of development) readers can get a
sense of consistency. Both Pyramid and TSS are Origin Award Nominees, so
they seem like good models to imitate.
If everyone is happy to let me take on the task of assembling, we should
iron out the ideas above and start working on submissions. If not, those
objecting should bring their cases forward. :)
-- -----------------------------------------------
The Fudge List FAQ is at http://fudge.phoenyx.net/
** Don't start deliberately off-topic threads. **
| Sequence | First Line | Username | Date |
| 0 |
After due reflection over this weekend and the last few days, I've
decided I'm very interested in seeing this project moving forward. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 17:30:34 |
| 1 |
If I am adding a character description to an article is it OK to use
the attributes and skills from "Fantasy Fudge"? |
Mitchw |
2001-06-28 21:49:21 |
| 2 |
One question: the cost to a writer in terms of time and money? |
JohnStrain |
2001-06-26 19:52:52 |
| 3 |
Sorry, but I couldn't resist trying to come up with a few 'zine names.
Here are some of my ideas: Fudgezine - Fudge + Magazine... |
DanielDavis |
2001-06-26 20:49:03 |
| 4 |
to it): > > Fudge Sundae > Fudge'Zine > > Go ahead! |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 20:33:13 |
| 5 |
choose what fudge rules and add-ons we use so.... |
JimDickinson |
2001-06-26 22:39:21 |
| 6 |
changes > based on the amount of content... |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 04:20:41 |
| 7 |
those who volunteered to write have no > objections, it looks like I
have a job. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 03:17:10 |
| 8 |
make a > > decision. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 17:07:13 |
| 9 |
long as you're open to involving others in the > > management. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 16:07:57 |
| 10 |
I'd be willing to write a regular once-per-month column on settings.
-Mark On Tuesday 26 June 2001 03:48 pm, you wrote: > Since it looks
like most of those who volunteered to write have no > objections, it
looks like I have a job. |
MarkCChuCarroll |
2001-06-27 12:32:41 |
| 11 |
Everyone > > should offer their opinion, and I'll listen. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 18:25:39 |
| 12 |
Hi, I fell off the edge of the world a while back. |
RohanLight |
2001-06-27 20:07:44 |
| 13 |
agree with it being free. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-27 20:16:20 |
| 14 |
volunteered to write "a few articles a year", but you > haven't said
any of those would be for our first articles. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 19:44:15 |
| 15 |
decisions that the group hasn't made by > general consensus, I'll know
what you're worried about. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 19:28:59 |
| 16 |
*don't* want anyone else involved? |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 17:55:59 |
| 17 |
entire > newsgroup heirarchies, multiple print magazines, and mailing
lists with > hundreds of members supporting the community? |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 22:31:21 |
| 18 |
and > declared it to be a group-run project. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 20:24:29 |
| 19 |
I am good at concepts but notoriously bad at translating my ideas into
finished products (articles, source books, etc.) But if I do manage to
write down something I think is coherent then I would like to know
that one individual has the final |
Mitchw |
2001-06-27 18:54:05 |
| 20 |
From: Brett Sanger >I've seen a lot of projects die because there was
too much talk about the >project and not enough code being written.
I've been pushing for >articles, and I've tried to resolve minor
issues (such as the name), but >you need |
TnbaGwell |
2001-06-27 21:10:30 |
| 21 |
into this and having someone steal the ball and > run willy-nilly over
the horizon with it is annoying. |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-28 03:04:18 |
| 22 |
the opinions are in, someone > needs to make a decision. |
DrIanMcDonald |
2001-06-27 23:22:30 |
| 23 |
I think this argument is getting a bit personal... |
MarkCChuCarroll |
2001-06-28 14:15:45 |
| 24 |
when > the first issue is, so I can't give an answer. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-28 18:41:18 |
| 25 |
of readers... |
AdamJ |
2001-06-28 18:39:24 |
| 26 |
a bad rep. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-28 21:31:27 |
| 27 |
My thoughts: > Fiction (Gamer fiction has a bad rep. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-28 21:45:04 |
| 28 |
Something I think could be handled on a case-by-case basis. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-28 23:51:27 |
| 29 |
legalities only, IMHO. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-29 03:06:39 |
| 30 |
needs to be a decision. |
WoEd |
2001-06-29 03:22:39 |
| 31 |
effectively as a > > "benevolent dictatorship". |
DrIanMcDonald |
2001-06-28 21:33:36 |
| 32 |
agree. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-29 13:08:17 |
| 33 |
quickly > > I expect to finalize everything by Friday, and start
collecting articles > for the first issue. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 03:19:48 |
| 34 |
Also throwing in my $0.02 worth... |
SpalLino |
2001-06-30 15:52:45 |
| 35 |
course...but good (and GOOD for that matter ) is > subjective. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-30 15:06:26 |
| 36 |
[mailto:fudge-error@phoenyx.net]On Behalf Of Brett Sanger Sent:
Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:05 PM To: fudge@phoenyx.net Subject: FUDGE:
Webzine: Open Issues >Fiction (Gamer fiction has a bad rep. |
LonSarver |
2001-07-01 21:12:00 |
| 37 |
also a father the concept of propogating > this [expletive deleted] -
"blood OK, sex taboo policy." is bogus. |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-02 16:19:58 |
| 38 |
In a message dated 06/28/2001 10:00:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
morrow@io.com writes: > > _Titanic_ was PG-13 and included nudity and
a sex scene. |
MalaGigi |
2001-06-29 14:09:45 |
| 39 |
From: "Lon Sarver" >> Is it just me, or is anyone else disturbed by
the standard that it's more >> acceptable to show someone's guts
splattered than it is to show their >> genitals? |
JimDickinson |
2001-07-03 03:51:34 |
| 40 |
No it isnt just you, and I am also a father the concept of propogating
I am > > also an Artist and the word boycott springs to mind. |
LanceDyas |
2001-07-03 05:37:12 |
| 41 |
some criteria as to what is and isn't a > suitable article at the
start, even if it is just a broad stroke such > as "no porn, no
excessive violence, etc'. |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-03 14:05:10 |
| 42 |
will submit > "The Erotic Adventures of Miss Betty Herschel Amoung >
the Midgets of Mars" as a campaign setting, and even > less likely
that it... |
LAPArcilla |
2001-07-03 11:39:23 |
| 43 |
submission "unacceptable" before being faced with a >_single_
questionable submission, or even enough submissions >to make one
magazine? |
JasonAnderson |
2001-07-03 05:53:26 |
| 44 |
I'm beginning to find some of these discussions of hypothetical
editorial situations to be quite silly. |
SgRay |
2001-07-02 21:32:43 |
| 45 |
"no nudity" is to not > drive off people who dislike nudity, Which was
the original reason given. |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-02 20:47:01 |
| 46 |
agreement, but legally, there's a big difference > between
"potentially porn" and "potentially evil". |
WoEd |
2001-07-02 20:42:33 |
| 47 |
father the concept of propogating > > this [expletive deleted] -
"blood OK, sex taboo policy." is bogus. |
WoEd |
2001-07-02 20:28:16 |
| 48 |
anyone else disturbed by the standard that it's more > acceptable to
show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their > genitals?
Yes, I think there should be more nudity and less prudish attitudes.
The really odd thing is that it bugs |
WoEd |
2001-07-02 20:21:08 |
| 49 |
risking > > some 12-year-old's mom accusing us of feeding porn to her
son? |
BrettRitter |
2001-07-02 19:48:49 |
| 50 |
artiste sensibilities are offended by your work having been > edited,
you'll either have to get over it or give up on writing. |
WoEd |
2001-07-02 19:42:56 |
| 51 |
better in > this example and I don't mean simple things like spelling
or obvious grammar > mistakes as opposed to stylized grammar changes)
and then I go out and > publish it myself with the editors changes.
Technically and legally I > believe |
BrettRitter |
2001-07-02 19:11:24 |
| 52 |
this is pretty commonly done. |
WoEd |
2001-07-02 19:01:52 |
| 53 |
Well I'm from the "hate cookies, and know why they are important -
sometimes", and Polls are def in the category rather than not in.
----- Original Message ----- From: Shawn McMahon on Monday, July 02,
2001 6:55 AM wrote > > Using cookies will |
JohnStrain |
2001-07-02 18:00:30 |
| 54 |
be just as happy without artwork (but with a nice > graphic design to
the zine's website) as with. |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-02 13:48:53 |
| 55 |
Policies that attempt to "offend no-one" are a summary waste of time
obviously. |
LanceDyas |
2001-07-02 13:34:11 |
| 56 |
No it isnt just you, and I am also a father the concept of propogating
this [expletive deleted] - "blood OK, sex taboo policy." is bogus. |
LanceDyas |
2001-07-02 13:23:38 |
| 57 |
just me, or is anyone else disturbed by the standard that it's more >
acceptable to show someone's guts splattered than it is to show their
arrested for one than the other. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-07-02 12:19:04 |
| 58 |
This brings up a technical issue... |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-07-02 11:55:56 |
| 59 |
From: "Lon Sarver" > Is it just me, or is anyone else disturbed by the
standard that it's more > acceptable to show someone's guts splattered
than it is to show their > genitals? |
GhostGames |
2001-07-02 11:47:07 |
| 60 |
point out that I have no professional editing > experience, nor am I
an English nerd, so take all of this with the > appropriate amount of
salt. |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-01 14:06:17 |
| 61 |
subjective. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-30 22:00:11 |
| 62 |
(IP issues) > >The law raises its ugly head once again. |
AdamJ |
2001-06-30 16:27:49 |
| 63 |
idea of polls. |
SpalLino |
2001-06-30 15:56:46 |
| 64 |
bad rep. |
JweLls |
2001-06-30 12:06:31 |
| 65 |
"quality?" Those > > are my concerns. |
BillHamilton |
2001-06-30 05:14:30 |
| 66 |
Enough people want > this to happen for us not to fear losing
momentum, and more time to > consider want we want to do wouldn't
hurt. |
DhobErman |
2001-06-29 22:37:25 |
| 67 |
Actually, I think this is going a little too quickly. |
DrIanMcDonald |
2001-06-29 22:06:24 |
| 68 |
for style and what is "quality?" Those > are my concerns. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-29 21:48:53 |
| 69 |
realistic). |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-29 12:57:21 |
| 70 |
it's amateur press, in the sense of amateur press alliance. |
WoEd |
2001-06-29 03:43:41 |
| 71 |
I missed your declaration) > (I'm not holding anyone to these, just
getting an estimate) > jwells@netten.net (short article every other
month) > spallinoaj@dp.net (depending on content) > raven@phoenyx.net
(a few articles a year) > jason_ga@so |
SpalLino |
2001-06-29 03:19:04 |
| 72 |
all" nature of Fudge, I think the zine should > maintain a "family
friendly" tone. |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-29 03:18:13 |
| 73 |
able >to evaluate the quality of the conversion if none are familiar
with the >system in question. |
JasonAnderson |
2001-06-29 02:58:13 |
| 74 |
fiction has a bad rep. |
WoEd |
2001-06-29 02:52:43 |
| 75 |
conversions (IP issues) > > My suggestion (since this will apply to me
in an article I'm thinking > of doing) is for the writer to get
permission from the relevant > company first. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-29 02:46:24 |
| 76 |
my hard disk or print out. |
ThomasBagwell |
2001-06-29 01:23:03 |
| 77 |
don't.) I don't have a real problem with this, but I'm fairly tolerant
of such things. |
JasonAnderson |
2001-06-29 00:23:00 |
| 78 |
various >> types of articles in order to publish? |
JasonAnderson |
2001-06-29 00:15:48 |
| 79 |
I've "Rational and level-headed"? |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-28 21:49:02 |
| 80 |
level-headed"? |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-28 21:56:57 |
| 81 |
don't.) I would say yes only for fiction that supports a specific
character or setting that is also included in the same issue. |
Mitchw |
2001-06-28 21:44:30 |
| 82 |
editors > time to get geared up, we have to get organized and a
web-site designed > and built. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-28 20:50:41 |
| 83 |
EXCEPT that I disagree about the back-end. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-28 21:12:21 |
| 84 |
editors/managers - not the whole list, >> not even the whole set of
contributors (but perhaps elected by the list >> or the contributors?)
- a small group, which coordinates through >> email to make decisions
for the zine. |
ScottBBarrie |
2001-06-28 20:41:52 |
| 85 |
you have > enough before then, great. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-28 19:24:48 |
| 86 |
"benevolent dictator" model won't work for > a community effort like
this. |
WoEd |
2001-06-28 16:33:52 |
| 87 |
opinions are in, someone > > needs to make a decision. |
WoEd |
2001-06-28 16:10:05 |
| 88 |
has been much closer to two-three issues a > year for the last two
years. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-28 14:35:05 |
| 89 |
Rohan, your mission , should you accept it. |
JohnStrain |
2001-06-28 05:25:46 |
| 90 |
I am "good at concepts" as well, Mitch. |
JohnStrain |
2001-06-28 04:59:39 |
| 91 |
wholly owned by Mark Imbriaco, and hosted > > by the company he
co-owns; HTML.com. |
LanceDyas |
2001-06-28 04:57:18 |
| 92 |
less than stellar regularity, but that hasn't >> stopped it from
becoming more successful with time. |
AdamJ |
2001-06-27 23:06:23 |
| 93 |
there are unknowns in any situation, and we could >play this game all
day long, so there's not much point to it. |
AdamJ |
2001-06-27 22:56:43 |
| 94 |
few? |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 22:22:22 |
| 95 |
Hi, how about this: Brett is deemed provisional 'Project Manager' for
the initialisation of the FUDGE webzine concept. |
RohanLight |
2001-06-27 20:40:58 |
| 96 |
worse at > > generating repeat traffic. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 20:32:58 |
| 97 |
chaotic. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 20:05:22 |
| 98 |
over 7 years now, and even with the recent > downturn and dot coms
going out of business left right and center, HTML.com > is still
profitable and has a stable and growing customer base. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 19:58:56 |
| 99 |
asked for input and has seemed to go for the > > majority decision in
every case so far. |
SgRay |
2001-06-27 19:52:30 |
| 100 |
We've got a rudementary disaster recovery plan and we maintain
off-site > backups. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-27 16:28:18 |
| 101 |
"issue"? |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 16:08:35 |
| 102 |
down, there's a good chance the Phoenyx doesn't > rise from the ashes
for quite some time. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 16:08:10 |
| 103 |
month, > to start. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 14:35:34 |
| 104 |
Yes, for hosting the zine I think my vote would have to go to >
Phoenyx. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-27 14:14:18 |
| 105 |
In a message dated 06/26/2001 1:34:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
swiftone@alumni.psu.edu writes: > > How about "Fudging It"? |
MalaGigi |
2001-06-27 13:37:12 |
| 106 |
June 26, 2001 11:19 PM Subject: Re: FUDGE: Webzine: FUDGE: Webzine > >
We need someone to design the look-and-feel of the site. |
EdwardWedig |
2001-06-27 11:15:00 |
| 107 |
compliant browser out there. |
LanceDyas |
2001-06-27 06:30:17 |
| 108 |
to debate] > > The Fudge Factor? |
WoEd |
2001-06-27 03:52:29 |
| 109 |
then let the list roast it :) Form follows > function, so some
elements will depend on the size of each issue, which in > turn will
depend on the material submitted. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 03:32:49 |
| 110 |
promote Fudge by writing Fudge articles for other > zines and
magazines? |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 03:25:14 |
| 111 |
6,000 words/issue. |
JasonAnderson |
2001-06-27 02:37:42 |
| 112 |
to debate] > No ideas presented so far, aside from discarding "The
Hypothetical Zine" > (which does have a wistful appeal) F.I.R.S.T.
Fudge Internet Roleplaying Society Tastes (or Tales or Themes :-)
Other than that I like the idea of somethin |
WoEd |
2001-06-27 02:28:04 |
| 113 |
Add me to writer status: on request article not to exceed 4000 words
John Strain missingjn@dixie-net.com ----- Original Message ----- From:
Brett Sanger To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:48 PM Subject: FUDGE:
Webzine: Zine Status > Since it l |
JohnStrain |
2001-06-26 22:45:25 |
| 114 |
folk to > > Fudge. |
SharonTripp |
2001-06-26 22:30:23 |
| 115 |
up being a weekly zine, Fudge Sunday. |
SharonTripp |
2001-06-26 22:28:35 |
| 116 |
Would we do more to promote Fudge by writing Fudge articles for other
them published. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-26 22:00:53 |
| 117 |
we might attract new folk to > Fudge. |
DrIanMcDonald |
2001-06-26 21:19:44 |
| 118 |
Magazine... |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-26 21:01:40 |
| 119 |
Considering I'm but a lurker who likes to write, I'd love to write
something for this project. |
GmtcaCkler |
2001-06-26 20:58:32 |
| 120 |
On 06/26/01 at 01:45 PM, John Morrow said: >Some off-the-cuff
suggestions for categories? |
ErisReddoch |
2001-06-26 20:29:27 |
| 121 |
On 06/26/01 at 01:43 PM, Carl D Cravens said: >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001
sgray@sudval.org wrote: >> My vote is for HTML. |
ErisReddoch |
2001-06-26 20:16:36 |
| 122 |
guide (v. |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-26 19:21:43 |
| 123 |
[mailto:morrow@fnord.io.com] >I'll agree with votes for HTML put
forward so far. |
MatthewsonKent |
2001-06-26 18:55:31 |
| 124 |
Particularly if you keep the HTML > lynx-friendly (no frames, no
tables, no java, avoid > imagemaps, all images with "alt" tags). |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-26 18:43:36 |
| 125 |
web 'zine. |
SgRay |
2001-06-26 18:13:35 |
| 126 |
reflection over this weekend and the last few days, I've decided > I'm
very interested in seeing this project moving forward. |
WoEd |
2001-06-26 17:55:02 |
| 127 |
the sarcasm didnt quite come out, You're right... |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-03 14:00:47 |
| 128 |
ratings might be good, *if* we can come up with a suitable > rating
system. |
WoEd |
2001-07-02 19:48:57 |
| 129 |
about a country that just made child pornography illegal 3 > years
ago. |
WoEd |
2001-07-02 19:07:50 |
| 130 |
I'm beginning to think it's time to take the organizational issues
private > to the leadership team and let the community judge our
efforts instead of > judging us on speculation. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-07-02 16:29:14 |
| 131 |
else disturbed by the standard that it's more > acceptable to show
someone's guts splattered than it is to show their > genitals? |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-02 00:44:45 |
| 132 |
the standard that it's more > acceptable to show someone's guts
splattered than it is to show their > genitals? |
DrIanMcDonald |
2001-07-01 22:58:26 |
| 133 |
[mailto:fudge-error@phoenyx.net]On Behalf Of woed Sent: Thursday, June
28, 2001 7:53 PM To: fudge@phoenyx.net Subject: Re: FUDGE: Webzine:
Open Issues Ryan wrote: > Art > >All we can get, but where is the line
drawn with regards to nudity/sexu |
LonSarver |
2001-07-01 21:04:08 |
| 134 |
They can be a lot of fun and very interesting to > read. |
CarlCravens |
2001-07-01 20:03:13 |
| 135 |
On 06/30/01 at 07:06 AM, Jonathan Wells said: >At 04:05 PM 6/28/01
-0500, you wrote: >>Fiction (Gamer fiction has a bad rep. |
ErisReddoch |
2001-06-30 14:23:42 |
| 136 |
I third the motion. |
JohnStrain |
2001-06-29 05:05:28 |
| 137 |
a bad rep. |
BillHamilton |
2001-06-29 05:04:45 |
| 138 |
technically in a global market, what is > PG-13? |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-29 04:59:45 |
| 139 |
ceases to be > > an amateur press. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-29 03:50:56 |
| 140 |
These are some topics that will need to be decided that haven't really
come up. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-28 21:05:09 |
| 141 |
set a target date of one month from today? |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-28 20:45:11 |
| 142 |
to how many articles >we'll have. |
TnbaGwell |
2001-06-28 19:16:03 |
| 143 |
me know, just as the call for articles said. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-28 18:02:00 |
| 144 |
and having someone steal the ball and > > run willy-nilly over the
horizon with it is annoying. |
WoEd |
2001-06-28 16:28:41 |
| 145 |
wholly owned by Mark Imbriaco, and hosted > by the company he co-owns;
HTML.com. |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-28 03:07:20 |
| 146 |
I'd say that's >> one of the major determining factors, since the rest
of the specs and >> features available look mostly the same. |
AdamJ |
2001-06-28 02:52:41 |
| 147 |
the 'net does Phoenyx have? |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-28 01:44:05 |
| 148 |
I'm part of several small communities of less than 5000 members (and
perhaps a rival government or two in exile). |
SgRay |
2001-06-28 00:48:45 |
| 149 |
Just > what are you expecting here? |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 20:23:05 |
| 150 |
if anyone doesn't LIKE your style, > nothing is stopping him/her from
making her/his own zine. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 20:02:48 |
| 151 |
debate] >> raven@phoenyx.net has offered space on Phoenyx. |
AdamJ |
2001-06-27 18:56:33 |
| 152 |
doesn't mean > he will. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 18:44:33 |
| 153 |
were a > bad thing. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 17:27:53 |
| 154 |
record. |
WoEd |
2001-06-27 18:33:50 |
| 155 |
In a message dated 06/27/2001 9:09:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
raven@phoenyx.net writes: > Which means the day of the week you update
will keep moving. |
MalaGigi |
2001-06-27 16:46:18 |
| 156 |
(I think this was directed at me.) > > You can add me to the list of
volunteers. |
EdwardWedig |
2001-06-27 15:29:02 |
| 157 |
content, > but chock full of useful bits for the average gamer. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 14:40:01 |
| 158 |
June 26, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: FUDGE: Webzine: Zine Status > > 2)
Volunteers to tap [Always open] > (Speak up if your willing or if I
missed your declaration) > (I'm not holding anyone to these, just
getting an estimate) > jwells@netten.net (s |
EdwardWedig |
2001-06-27 11:10:43 |
| 159 |
is supposedly fully compliant with the >current HTML standard. |
JweLls |
2001-06-27 06:05:04 |
| 160 |
lynx-friendly (no frames, no tables, no java, avoid > >> imagemaps,
all images with "alt" tags). |
BillHamilton |
2001-06-27 05:20:52 |
| 161 |
disclaimer at the start of every article. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 04:36:12 |
| 162 |
each >article. |
JasonAnderson |
2001-06-27 04:32:01 |
| 163 |
the > management. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 04:18:43 |
| 164 |
our >private funds. |
JasonAnderson |
2001-06-27 03:33:13 |
| 165 |
necessarily > the person who will do the day-to-day coding of HTML.
Are you wanting to > do that or will we need to recruit a volunteer.
I'll take a stab at it, then let the list roast it :) Form follows
function, so some elements will depend |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 03:24:46 |
| 166 |
system already on my side (Template::Toolkit). |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-27 02:57:21 |
| 167 |
It's Got my vote:) John strain ----- Original Message ----- From:
Jonathan Wells To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:59 PM Subject: Re:
FUDGE: Webzine: Name-Foo! |
JohnStrain |
2001-06-26 22:52:29 |
| 168 |
but I couldn't resist trying to come up with a few 'zine names. |
Mitchw |
2001-06-26 22:27:01 |
| 169 |
I support pdf as well as html. |
ShawnMcMahon |
2001-06-26 21:59:18 |
| 170 |
logo for those titles... |
DanielDavis |
2001-06-26 21:15:38 |
| 171 |
Fudge E-zine") Now this I like. |
JweLls |
2001-06-26 20:59:37 |
| 172 |
catagories do you have in mind? |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 20:31:17 |
| 173 |
No ideas presented so far, aside from discarding "The Hypothetical
Zine" > (which does have a wistful appeal) To put a couple on the
table (again, I'm not particularly attached to it): Fudge Sundae
Fudge'Zine Go ahead! |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-26 20:06:13 |
| 174 |
Since it looks like most of those who volunteered to write have no
objections, it looks like I have a job. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 19:48:36 |
| 175 |
thing to do, because I don't want to sound arrogant, >> while it is
actually an action that _is_ arrogant :) > >At the risk of sounding
arrogant myself, I'm going to put forth the >Phoenyx as being an ideal
place to host this. |
AdamJ |
2001-06-26 19:36:50 |
| 176 |
offering to coordinate soliciting and gathering > articles, and
compiling them into issues, along with basic editing and > cohesion
tasks. |
JohnMorrow |
2001-06-26 18:45:07 |
| 177 |
to do, because I don't want to sound arrogant, > while it is actually
an action that _is_ arrogant :) At the risk of sounding arrogant
myself, I'm going to put forth the Phoenyx as being an ideal place to
host this. |
CarlCravens |
2001-06-26 18:39:44 |
| 178 |
publish it or > sell it if an editor has touched it. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-29 03:53:26 |
| 179 |
with you _and_ the majority disagrees with you, as > the man on the
ground I hope that you will do things your > own way that take into
account: While I'm all for job satisfaction, the only reason I can
foresee bucking the community is if the |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 20:09:39 |
| 180 |
(I broke the messages up to cover different issues) > Getting stuck on
one article doesn't stop me from writing > others. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 18:32:54 |
| 181 |
bit, but the ability to define my own plugins won me over to Toolkit.
Either way it's the same basic concept. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-27 04:51:20 |
| 182 |
logo for those titles... |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 21:23:25 |
| 183 |
Regardless of how big the issue is going to be, I'm going to need
articles. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 20:16:25 |
| 184 |
Friday, and start collecting articles for the first issue. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 19:57:19 |
| 185 |
The > editor would submit formatted articles with a web-utility and
generate the > pages from templates. |
BrettRitter |
2001-06-26 19:32:47 |