Fudge RPG - Hi-res Fudge Logo

Important! This is an archived mailing list. Subscription information included in any messages is no longer current. Over the years, addresses and websites have changed. Follow offsite links at your own risk.

Hello!


Someone knows where could I find some hi-res Fudge Logo?

I need it for place in a work to be distributed in PDF.
-- 

Thanks
======================================================================
Fabio Emilio Costa                         Borda da Mata - MG - Brazil
Linux User #328087 (counter.li.org)
fudgebrasil@yahoo.com.br                               Nick:SamWeasley
MSN: hufflepuffbr@hotmail.com          Yahoo! Messenger:hufflepuff0305
Jabber: SamWeasley@jabber.org                          ICQ #:173799674
======================================================================
Orkut Profile: www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=16619557238254357700
Blog: www.livejournal.com/users/fabiocosta


-- 
Essa mensagem est_ livre de v_rus
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 03/01/05
-- -----------------------------------------------------------
The Fudge List FAQ is at http://fudge.phoenyx.net/listfaq.html
       ** Don't start deliberately off-topic threads. **

Sequence	First Line	Username	Date
0	I realize I'm dragging out a week-old thread here, but I was in Japan over the holidays and just got back. Licenses aren't magical spells that seek out all copies of a work in all forms.	NickMoffitt	2005-01-12 21:10:48
1	CH>I disagree about mechanics not being copyrightable, I CH>think that its just been that no one has pushed the CH>issue in court. Actually, it has come up in court.	KarenCravens	2005-01-06 22:30:43
2	> So, in other words, it's the Fudge rules mechanics that If you designate that portion of your work as "product identity", yes. > So if I were to do a table top skirmish system with Fudge Basically your new thing can't take any part of	FredHicks	2005-01-06 19:24:42
3	The OGL itself can't be altered by anyone except WotC, as it is copyright by them.	ChrisHelton	2005-01-06 01:07:38
4	I've only actually seen it in reference to d20 products (which I greatly dislike) and I've tried making sense of it and I think I kinda grasp it...	DavidJaquith	2005-01-06 00:20:13
5	> Someone knows where could I find some hi-res Fudge Logo? You'd need Ann Dupuis' help and approval for that.	FredHicks	2005-01-05 23:27:53
6	> Hello! http:/www.fudgerpg.compublishers<A> You can use it whether you're releasing your .pdf under the Open Game License or under the original Fudge Legal Notice.	GhostGames	2005-01-05 23:32:55
7	Speaking of the OGL...	DavidJaquith	2005-01-05 23:48:08
8	David, Because I'm lazy, could you cite where you're looking at the OGL?	BenWilson	2005-01-06 00:01:23
9	Yeah, lawyers write that way because 1) they bill at $100/hour to translate (depending on market) and 2) (because they love to find loopholes) they try to write a loophole free deal.	BenWilson	2005-01-06 00:30:10
10	Phys-Ed class?	BillHamilton	2005-01-06 00:50:43
11	But as a legal document it doesn't work that way.	ChrisHelton	2005-01-06 01:48:48
12	Hello!	FabioEmilioCosta	2005-01-05 23:20:01
13	I never said to alter the OGL...	DavidJaquith	2005-01-06 01:14:40
14	Em 050105 21:32 Ann Dupuis escreveu:	FabioEmilioCosta	2005-01-06 12:16:32
15	I don't think he was a published paragraph summarizing the OGL but rather a summarize of the OGL on this list or via private e-mail would please him.	EricPaquette	2005-01-06 14:05:33
16	And the point that I am trying to make is that it doesn't work that way.	ChrisHelton	2005-01-06 14:55:47
17	> And the point that I am trying to make is that it Sure.	FredHicks	2005-01-06 18:40:58
18	> * Including the OGL in your own document basically says So, in other words, it's the Fudge rules mechanics that you list as not "exclusively yours" thus allowing others to use Fudge style mechanics in their own OGL works. The actual content of	DamOsan	2005-01-06 19:09:18
19	Actually, no.	ChrisHelton	2005-01-06 19:33:16
20	This OGL discussion is teaching me quite a bit about how that license works. When Fudge does fall under the OGL will the old license still be valid or will the OGL take over completely?-- ----------------------------------------------------------- The	DamOsan	2005-01-06 21:09:26
21	design > ...	ChrisHelton	2005-01-06 22:20:42
22	> Actually, no.	FredHicks	2005-01-06 19:52:27
23	The OGL is a good thing for RPG writers using Fudge rules because it lets the writer put their effort into the background and not the rules except for tweaks here and there. How will OGL/Fudge affect someone who uses Fudge to derive a miniatures	DamOsan	2005-01-06 22:58:44
24	Well, instead of trying to answer your question directly ...	FredHicks	2005-01-07 00:07:47
25	FH> Well, instead of trying to answer your question directly FH> ...	KarenCravens	2005-01-07 04:04:04
26	This conversation should really be happening on the fudge+pub subtopic. (Ann also runs an open fudgelegal list and a publishers-only fudgepublishers list, which is probably what you were thinking of.) The Fudge List FAQ is at DrIanMcDonald	2005-01-07 09:24:39
27	> This OGL discussion is teaching me quite a bit about how I believe Ann's said something about being able to use either the Fudge license or the OGL with it, but I'm not clear on that.	FredHicks	2005-01-06 21:52:32
28	NM>Unless the license has some specific statement in it such as "if I put NM>a new license up, this license is void", then you were still given NM>permission to do the things in the original license. Maybe, depending on the state (as in United, or a	KarenCravens	2005-01-12 22:46:15
29	Maybe this is of interest: http:/thefga.comindex.phparticles18<A> and this: http://thefga.com	CaioMaximinoDeOl	2005-01-13 12:50:00

Sequence

First Line

Username

Date

I realize I'm dragging out a week-old thread here, but I was in Japan over the holidays and just got back.

Licenses aren't magical spells that seek out all copies of a work in all forms.

NickMoffitt

2005-01-12 21:10:48

CH>I disagree about mechanics not being copyrightable, I CH>think that its just been that no one has pushed the CH>issue in court.

Actually, it has come up in court.

KarenCravens

2005-01-06 22:30:43

> So, in other words, it's the Fudge rules mechanics that

If you designate that portion of your work as "product identity", yes.

> So if I were to do a table top skirmish system with Fudge

Basically your new thing can't take any part of

FredHicks

2005-01-06 19:24:42

The OGL itself can't be altered by anyone except WotC, as it is copyright by them.

ChrisHelton

2005-01-06 01:07:38

I've only actually seen it in reference to d20 products (which I greatly dislike) and I've tried making sense of it and I think I kinda grasp it...

DavidJaquith

2005-01-06 00:20:13

> Someone knows where could I find some hi-res Fudge Logo?

You'd need Ann Dupuis' help and approval for that.

FredHicks

2005-01-05 23:27:53

> Hello!

http:/www.fudgerpg.compublishers<A>

You can use it whether you're releasing your .pdf under the Open Game License or under the original Fudge Legal Notice.

GhostGames

2005-01-05 23:32:55

Speaking of the OGL...

DavidJaquith

2005-01-05 23:48:08

David,

Because I'm lazy, could you cite where you're looking at the OGL?

BenWilson

2005-01-06 00:01:23

Yeah, lawyers write that way because 1) they bill at $100/hour to translate (depending on market) and 2) (because they love to find loopholes) they try to write a loophole free deal.

BenWilson

2005-01-06 00:30:10

Phys-Ed class?

BillHamilton

2005-01-06 00:50:43

But as a legal document it doesn't work that way.

ChrisHelton

2005-01-06 01:48:48

Hello!

FabioEmilioCosta

2005-01-05 23:20:01

I never said to alter the OGL...

DavidJaquith

2005-01-06 01:14:40

Em 050105 21:32 Ann Dupuis escreveu:

FabioEmilioCosta

2005-01-06 12:16:32

I don't think he was a published paragraph summarizing the OGL but rather a summarize of the OGL on this list or via private e-mail would please him.

EricPaquette

2005-01-06 14:05:33

And the point that I am trying to make is that it doesn't work that way.

ChrisHelton

2005-01-06 14:55:47

> And the point that I am trying to make is that it

Sure.

FredHicks

2005-01-06 18:40:58

> * Including the OGL in your own document basically says

So, in other words, it's the Fudge rules mechanics that you list as not "exclusively yours" thus allowing others to use Fudge style mechanics in their own OGL works.

The actual content of

DamOsan

2005-01-06 19:09:18

Actually, no.

ChrisHelton

2005-01-06 19:33:16

This OGL discussion is teaching me quite a bit about how that license works. When Fudge does fall under the OGL will the old license still be valid or will the OGL take over completely?-- ----------------------------------------------------------- The

2005-01-06 21:09:26

2005-01-06 22:20:42

2005-01-06 19:52:27

The OGL is a good thing for RPG writers using Fudge rules because it lets the writer put their effort into the background and not the rules except for tweaks here and there.

How will OGL/Fudge affect someone who uses Fudge to derive a miniatures

DamOsan

2005-01-06 22:58:44

Well, instead of trying to answer your question directly ...

FredHicks

2005-01-07 00:07:47

FH> Well, instead of trying to answer your question directly FH> ...

KarenCravens

2005-01-07 04:04:04

This conversation should really be happening on the fudge+pub subtopic.

(Ann also runs an open fudgelegal list and a publishers-only fudgepublishers list, which is probably what you were thinking of.)

The Fudge List FAQ is at DrIanMcDonald

2005-01-07 09:24:39

> This OGL discussion is teaching me quite a bit about how

I believe Ann's said something about being able to use either the Fudge license or the OGL with it, but I'm not clear on that.

FredHicks

2005-01-06 21:52:32

NM>Unless the license has some specific statement in it such as "if I put NM>a new license up, this license is void", then you were still given NM>permission to do the things in the original license.

Maybe, depending on the state (as in United, or a

KarenCravens

2005-01-12 22:46:15

Maybe this is of interest:
http:/thefga.comindex.phparticles18<A> and this:
http://thefga.com

CaioMaximinoDeOl

2005-01-13 12:50:00