Home | Forum | Unread | Sign in | Sign in | Beta? | Wiki
The Phoenyx
your roleplaying community

games > kalyr > main

Kalyr is set in my original fantasy world of Kalyr, and focuses on the struggle between the ancient and decadent kandar civilisation, and their rebellious human slaves. It features psionics, arcane technology, strange alien races, mystery and intrigue. Influences include Gene Wolfe & Jack Vance, but don't let that put you off!
Subscribe | Unread | Recent | Group options | Topic options | Post
TimHall
Tim Hall

Thu

Jun 8
2000

10:51Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

2 things

One - since the Filgeth game isn't now going to be running on the
list, I'm going to drop using subtopics for the game posts; the use
(and misuse) of the subtopics are causing more problems than they're
currently worth.  

However, if we need to bring them back at some point in the future, I
*will* enforce their use.

Secondly, addressed particularly to Michael - Please *don't* mess
about with the subject line of game posts!   Both my mail program and
more importantly the phoenyx web archives currently under development
*rely* on the subject line staying consistant in order to thread
messages correctly.  If you use a non-threading mail program you might
not realise this.

It's a lot harder for me to keep track of broken off bits of thread
caused by, for example, someone changing "Kalyr :Calb 44 - Morning' to
'Kalyr:Calb Move 44 - Morning'. 

I realise the threading of move 44 has already been blown to hell, but
let's try and keep move 45 and subsequent moves clean.

--
Tim Hall, timjh (at) compuserve.com
* http://www.kalyr.com

"Divide by cucumber error: Please reinstall universe and reboot"


MichaelOrton
Michael Orton

Thu

Jun 8
2000

22:45Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

Re Tim's Admin mesage:


>2 things
>
>One - since the Filgeth game isn't now going to be running on the
>list, I'm going to drop using subtopics for the game posts; the use
>(and misuse) of the subtopics are causing more problems than they're
>currently worth.
>
>However, if we need to bring them back at some point in the future, I
>*will* enforce their use.
>
>Secondly, addressed particularly to Michael - Please *don't* mess
>about with the subject line of game posts!   Both my mail program and
>more importantly the phoenyx web archives currently under development
>*rely* on the subject line staying consistant in order to thread
>messages correctly.  If you use a non-threading mail program you might
>not realise this.


I'm using Outlook Express - which does not thread.

I was entirely unaware that changing the subject line had any import
whatsoever.   I was trying to reply to the subtopic which I thought was of
import and becasue the post from Phoenyx does not come from the subtopic
when I hit reply it was not included in the "To:".

If you need to bring back subtopics I'm coing to have difficulty maintaining
the subject line becasue I cannot "reply to author" with them in the current
implementation.

It was not my intention to trash your threading - I will see what can be
done...

Rgds,
Michael.


KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Fri

Jun 9
2000

01:00Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Michael Orton wrote:

MO>I was entirely unaware that changing the subject line had any import
MO>whatsoever.   

It does to some peoples' mailreaders, and to the brand-spanking-new web
forum (see below).  At least, for varying values of "import."

MO>I was trying to reply to the subtopic which I thought was of
MO>import and becasue the post from Phoenyx does not come from the subtopic
MO>when I hit reply it was not included in the "To:".

Outlook Express, right?

It reeeeeally should respect the "Reply-to" line, which is the one that
includes the subtopic.  Forget Apple, *Microsoft* is the company that's
bound and determined to "think different[ly]."

I'll poke around with it on my machine, and see if there's a configuration
that will let it reply properly.  If not, I'll take a survey and see if
anyone's using the To: line (which is, currently, always consistent no
matter what subtopics are in use) to sort by.  If no one is, I can make
the To line reflect the subtopics too.  (It's much easier than getting
Microsoft to change *their* software, anyway, even if they're technically
wrong.)

MO>If you need to bring back subtopics I'm coing to have difficulty maintaining
MO>the subject line becasue I cannot "reply to author" with them in the current
MO>implementation.

If you're not averse to changing software, I *highly* recommend Pegasus
(http://www.pmail.com/).  It's free, does beautiful filtering and
organizing when it's set up right, and even handles the special
mailing-list functions embedded in the header of every Phoenyx message.  
And, like the Phoenyx, it's named after a mythical creature, so it's *got*
to be good.

Real Soon Now, we'll have a tutorial up on the Phoenyx web pages about how
to set up Pegasus (and eventually, every common mail reader (yes, even
Outlook) that we can get someone to write about... volunteers welcome) for
best operation with the Phoenyx.

MO>It was not my intention to trash your threading - I will see what can be
MO>done...

The web forum (http://www.phoenyx.net/forums/ if you want to take a
peek... it's open to the public now, although there's a lot of work to be
done on it to make it Really Cool) is a fairly new thing, and some of what
makes *it* happy isn't intuitively obvious when you're trying to make a
mailing list happy.

Making *everybody* happy at the same time is a challenge, to say the
least.  But as the threading gets smarter (e.g. able to use
References/InReplyTo/etc and maybe even quoted text itself, as well as the
subject lines, to figure threads out), it will require less special care
on the user end.  It's no good having all these advanced bells and
whistles if they just make posting a simple message harder.

I'll get off my soapbox now.  Anybody who's actually interested in the
inner workings of the Firehawk software, and in helping us improve same
(whether by just making suggestions from the user perspective, or by
writing things like the email how-to) is welcome to subscribe over at
http://www.wirebird.com/fh_users/  or just send your ideas to
support@phoenyx.net.

(We now return you to the game I have so wordily interrupted...)

-- 
Karen J. Cravens  silver@phoenyx.net

HughFoster
Hugh Foster

Sun

Jun 11
2000

10:15Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

>> If you need to bring back subtopics I'm coing to have 
difficulty maintaining  the subject line becasue I cannot 
"reply to author" with them in the current  implementation. <<

[I see your problem - it sticks "Re:" on all the time, 
doesn't it?]
--

[------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]
| Hugh Foster                                 100326,446       |
| Internet:                       hugh_foster@compuserve.com   |
|           http://www.gamestruth.com/Hugh/                    |
|          Please note new web page address                    |
| The good die young - because they see it's no use living if  |
| you've got to be good. (John Barrymore)                      |
[------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]


TimHall
Tim Hall

Sun

Jun 11
2000

12:11Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

Hugh Foster wrote:

>[I see your problem - it sticks "Re:" on all the time, 
>doesn't it?]

Re: doesn't cause problems, but changes to the subject lines following
the 'Re:' does.  

I think a lot of the problems we've been having are due to the
subtopic tags; one reason why I'm dropping the use of subtopics for
game postings.

Some people's mailers (including yours) do not seem to recognise the
'Reply-to' line in the email headers.  The phoenyx list server puts
the subtopic address as the reply-to:

So in the headers, you get this (this is a genuine example):

>From: Michael Orton 
>Subject: Kalyr:Calb Move 44 - Morning
>Sender: kalyr-error@phoenyx.net
>To: kalyr@phoenyx.net
>Reply-To: kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net

My mailer does not display Reply-To, but if I hit "reply", to the
example message, the reply address defaults to
kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net, not conteck@vossnet.co.uk

It seems some mailers do not do this automatically, despite this being
an internet standard.

The mail server also adds a subtopic tag to the mail, unless the tag
is already there - for the mail list, the tag is 'kalyr'.  In some
cases it's the drifting subtopics that are causing the subject line
changes.

--
Tim Hall, timjh (at) compuserve.com
* http://www.kalyr.com

"Divide by cucumber error: Please reinstall universe and reboot"


HughFoster
Hugh Foster

Tue

Jun 13
2000

18:59Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

My ReplyTo defaults to kalyr@phoenyx.net, every time - one unwelcome
spinoff of this is that unless there's a SIG or a character header I can't
tell who's speaking


TimHall
Tim Hall

Tue

Jun 13
2000

19:34Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:59:49 cdt, you wrote:

>My ReplyTo defaults to kalyr@phoenyx.net, every time - one unwelcome
>spinoff of this is that unless there's a SIG or a character header I can't
>tell who's speaking

If your mailer read the header below and made reply-to to be
kalyr@phoenyx.net, (Which only appears as to "To:" line, not 'From' or
'Reply-to'), I think there's a bug somewhere; it's simply not
interpreting the headers properly.  What mail program do you use?

>Date: Tue,  6 Jun 2000 16:38:06 cdt
>From: Tim Hall 
>X-From: Tim Hall 
>Subject: Kalyr:Calb 44 - Morning
>Sender: kalyr-error@phoenyx.net
>To: kalyr@phoenyx.net
>Reply-To: kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net
>Message-Id: <0Ww9Oc5czgsaFiDqsj1NwYcF9VWI@4ax.com>
>References: <003401bfc7fa$e8105880$f45abcc3@conteck>
>    
>    
>    
>In-Reply-To: 


--
Tim Hall - http://www.kalyr.com - ICQ# 74213108

"It's a fine line between clever and stupid"
  - Spinal Tap


HughFoster
Hugh Foster

Wed

Jun 14
2000

18:49Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

>>  I think there's a bug somewhere; it's simply not  
interpreting the headers properly.  What mail program do 
you use? <<

TAPCIS, sort of; I have a VB frontend but that doesn't 
handle the messages and headers, just the entry of text and 
placement of the files TAP uses to send the answers.

I can probably override it manually but it's awkward.
--

[------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]
| Hugh Foster                                 100326,446       |
| Internet:                       hugh_foster@compuserve.com   |
|           http://www.gamestruth.com/Hugh/                    |
|          Please note new web page address                    |
| Confidence is simply that quiet assurred feeling you have    |
| before you fall flat on your face. (Dr. L Binder)            |
[------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]


MichaelOrton
Michael Orton

Wed

Jun 14
2000

21:09Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

Continuing the discsuion on the interaction of the various possible
mailereaders...


>
>If your mailer read the header below and made reply-to to be
>kalyr@phoenyx.net, (Which only appears as to "To:" line, not 'From' or
>'Reply-to'), I think there's a bug somewhere; it's simply not
>interpreting the headers properly.  What mail program do you use?
>
>>Date: Tue,  6 Jun 2000 16:38:06 cdt
>>From: Tim Hall 
>>X-From: Tim Hall 
>>Subject: Kalyr:Calb 44 - Morning
>>Sender: kalyr-error@phoenyx.net
>>To: kalyr@phoenyx.net
>>Reply-To: kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net
>>Message-Id: <0Ww9Oc5czgsaFiDqsj1NwYcF9VWI@4ax.com>
>>References: <003401bfc7fa$e8105880$f45abcc3@conteck>
>>    
>>    
>>    
>>In-Reply-To: 


Well, Outlook Express won't show me all that admin stuff so I have no idea
what is going on inside.

Perhaps I will go for something a little more sophisticated on my next
system.

Rgds,
Michael.


HughFoster
Hugh Foster

Sun

Jun 18
2000

10:09Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

>> Well, Outlook Express won't show me all that admin stuff 
so I have no idea  what is going on inside.    Perhaps I 
will go for something a little more sophisticated on my 
next  system. <<

As far as I've ever been able to tell (and I work with it a 
lot) full Outlook doesn't, either. 
--

[------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]
| Hugh Foster                                 100326,446       |
| Internet:                       hugh_foster@compuserve.com   |
|           http://www.gamestruth.com/Hugh/                    |
|          Please note new web page address                    |
| Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.                |
[------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]


SeanNPagliarulo
Pagliarulo

Mon

Jun 19
2000

18:15Z

Kalyr Subject lines and subtopics

Outlook will show you the information, but you must double click on the
message to bring it up in its own window, or show a different set of fields
under your main Inbox window pane.

--Sean

Subject (required)




 
Refresh