
2 things One - since the Filgeth game isn't now going to be running on the list, I'm going to drop using subtopics for the game posts; the use (and misuse) of the subtopics are causing more problems than they're currently worth. However, if we need to bring them back at some point in the future, I *will* enforce their use. Secondly, addressed particularly to Michael - Please *don't* mess about with the subject line of game posts! Both my mail program and more importantly the phoenyx web archives currently under development *rely* on the subject line staying consistant in order to thread messages correctly. If you use a non-threading mail program you might not realise this. It's a lot harder for me to keep track of broken off bits of thread caused by, for example, someone changing "Kalyr :Calb 44 - Morning' to 'Kalyr:Calb Move 44 - Morning'. I realise the threading of move 44 has already been blown to hell, but let's try and keep move 45 and subsequent moves clean. -- Tim Hall, timjh (at) compuserve.com * http://www.kalyr.com "Divide by cucumber error: Please reinstall universe and reboot"
Re Tim's Admin mesage: >2 things > >One - since the Filgeth game isn't now going to be running on the >list, I'm going to drop using subtopics for the game posts; the use >(and misuse) of the subtopics are causing more problems than they're >currently worth. > >However, if we need to bring them back at some point in the future, I >*will* enforce their use. > >Secondly, addressed particularly to Michael - Please *don't* mess >about with the subject line of game posts! Both my mail program and >more importantly the phoenyx web archives currently under development >*rely* on the subject line staying consistant in order to thread >messages correctly. If you use a non-threading mail program you might >not realise this. I'm using Outlook Express - which does not thread. I was entirely unaware that changing the subject line had any import whatsoever. I was trying to reply to the subtopic which I thought was of import and becasue the post from Phoenyx does not come from the subtopic when I hit reply it was not included in the "To:". If you need to bring back subtopics I'm coing to have difficulty maintaining the subject line becasue I cannot "reply to author" with them in the current implementation. It was not my intention to trash your threading - I will see what can be done... Rgds, Michael.
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Michael Orton wrote: MO>I was entirely unaware that changing the subject line had any import MO>whatsoever. It does to some peoples' mailreaders, and to the brand-spanking-new web forum (see below). At least, for varying values of "import." MO>I was trying to reply to the subtopic which I thought was of MO>import and becasue the post from Phoenyx does not come from the subtopic MO>when I hit reply it was not included in the "To:". Outlook Express, right? It reeeeeally should respect the "Reply-to" line, which is the one that includes the subtopic. Forget Apple, *Microsoft* is the company that's bound and determined to "think different[ly]." I'll poke around with it on my machine, and see if there's a configuration that will let it reply properly. If not, I'll take a survey and see if anyone's using the To: line (which is, currently, always consistent no matter what subtopics are in use) to sort by. If no one is, I can make the To line reflect the subtopics too. (It's much easier than getting Microsoft to change *their* software, anyway, even if they're technically wrong.) MO>If you need to bring back subtopics I'm coing to have difficulty maintaining MO>the subject line becasue I cannot "reply to author" with them in the current MO>implementation. If you're not averse to changing software, I *highly* recommend Pegasus (http://www.pmail.com/). It's free, does beautiful filtering and organizing when it's set up right, and even handles the special mailing-list functions embedded in the header of every Phoenyx message. And, like the Phoenyx, it's named after a mythical creature, so it's *got* to be good. Real Soon Now, we'll have a tutorial up on the Phoenyx web pages about how to set up Pegasus (and eventually, every common mail reader (yes, even Outlook) that we can get someone to write about... volunteers welcome) for best operation with the Phoenyx. MO>It was not my intention to trash your threading - I will see what can be MO>done... The web forum (http://www.phoenyx.net/forums/ if you want to take a peek... it's open to the public now, although there's a lot of work to be done on it to make it Really Cool) is a fairly new thing, and some of what makes *it* happy isn't intuitively obvious when you're trying to make a mailing list happy. Making *everybody* happy at the same time is a challenge, to say the least. But as the threading gets smarter (e.g. able to use References/InReplyTo/etc and maybe even quoted text itself, as well as the subject lines, to figure threads out), it will require less special care on the user end. It's no good having all these advanced bells and whistles if they just make posting a simple message harder. I'll get off my soapbox now. Anybody who's actually interested in the inner workings of the Firehawk software, and in helping us improve same (whether by just making suggestions from the user perspective, or by writing things like the email how-to) is welcome to subscribe over at http://www.wirebird.com/fh_users/ or just send your ideas to support@phoenyx.net. (We now return you to the game I have so wordily interrupted...) -- Karen J. Cravens silver@phoenyx.net
>> If you need to bring back subtopics I'm coing to have difficulty maintaining the subject line becasue I cannot "reply to author" with them in the current implementation. << [I see your problem - it sticks "Re:" on all the time, doesn't it?] -- [------------------------------oOo-----------------------------] | Hugh Foster 100326,446 | | Internet: hugh_foster@compuserve.com | | http://www.gamestruth.com/Hugh/ | | Please note new web page address | | The good die young - because they see it's no use living if | | you've got to be good. (John Barrymore) | [------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]
Hugh Foster wrote: >[I see your problem - it sticks "Re:" on all the time, >doesn't it?] Re: doesn't cause problems, but changes to the subject lines following the 'Re:' does. I think a lot of the problems we've been having are due to the subtopic tags; one reason why I'm dropping the use of subtopics for game postings. Some people's mailers (including yours) do not seem to recognise the 'Reply-to' line in the email headers. The phoenyx list server puts the subtopic address as the reply-to: So in the headers, you get this (this is a genuine example): >From: Michael Orton>Subject: Kalyr:Calb Move 44 - Morning >Sender: kalyr-error@phoenyx.net >To: kalyr@phoenyx.net >Reply-To: kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net My mailer does not display Reply-To, but if I hit "reply", to the example message, the reply address defaults to kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net, not conteck@vossnet.co.uk It seems some mailers do not do this automatically, despite this being an internet standard. The mail server also adds a subtopic tag to the mail, unless the tag is already there - for the mail list, the tag is 'kalyr'. In some cases it's the drifting subtopics that are causing the subject line changes. -- Tim Hall, timjh (at) compuserve.com * http://www.kalyr.com "Divide by cucumber error: Please reinstall universe and reboot"
My ReplyTo defaults to kalyr@phoenyx.net, every time - one unwelcome spinoff of this is that unless there's a SIG or a character header I can't tell who's speaking
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:59:49 cdt, you wrote: >My ReplyTo defaults to kalyr@phoenyx.net, every time - one unwelcome >spinoff of this is that unless there's a SIG or a character header I can't >tell who's speaking If your mailer read the header below and made reply-to to be kalyr@phoenyx.net, (Which only appears as to "To:" line, not 'From' or 'Reply-to'), I think there's a bug somewhere; it's simply not interpreting the headers properly. What mail program do you use? >Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 16:38:06 cdt >From: Tim Hall>X-From: Tim Hall >Subject: Kalyr:Calb 44 - Morning >Sender: kalyr-error@phoenyx.net >To: kalyr@phoenyx.net >Reply-To: kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net >Message-Id: <0Ww9Oc5czgsaFiDqsj1NwYcF9VWI@4ax.com> >References: <003401bfc7fa$e8105880$f45abcc3@conteck> > > > >In-Reply-To: -- Tim Hall - http://www.kalyr.com - ICQ# 74213108 "It's a fine line between clever and stupid" - Spinal Tap
>> I think there's a bug somewhere; it's simply not interpreting the headers properly. What mail program do you use? << TAPCIS, sort of; I have a VB frontend but that doesn't handle the messages and headers, just the entry of text and placement of the files TAP uses to send the answers. I can probably override it manually but it's awkward. -- [------------------------------oOo-----------------------------] | Hugh Foster 100326,446 | | Internet: hugh_foster@compuserve.com | | http://www.gamestruth.com/Hugh/ | | Please note new web page address | | Confidence is simply that quiet assurred feeling you have | | before you fall flat on your face. (Dr. L Binder) | [------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]
Continuing the discsuion on the interaction of the various possible mailereaders... > >If your mailer read the header below and made reply-to to be >kalyr@phoenyx.net, (Which only appears as to "To:" line, not 'From' or >'Reply-to'), I think there's a bug somewhere; it's simply not >interpreting the headers properly. What mail program do you use? > >>Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 16:38:06 cdt >>From: Tim Hall>>X-From: Tim Hall >>Subject: Kalyr:Calb 44 - Morning >>Sender: kalyr-error@phoenyx.net >>To: kalyr@phoenyx.net >>Reply-To: kalyr+calbeyn@phoenyx.net >>Message-Id: <0Ww9Oc5czgsaFiDqsj1NwYcF9VWI@4ax.com> >>References: <003401bfc7fa$e8105880$f45abcc3@conteck> >> >> >> >>In-Reply-To: Well, Outlook Express won't show me all that admin stuff so I have no idea what is going on inside. Perhaps I will go for something a little more sophisticated on my next system. Rgds, Michael.
>> Well, Outlook Express won't show me all that admin stuff so I have no idea what is going on inside. Perhaps I will go for something a little more sophisticated on my next system. << As far as I've ever been able to tell (and I work with it a lot) full Outlook doesn't, either. -- [------------------------------oOo-----------------------------] | Hugh Foster 100326,446 | | Internet: hugh_foster@compuserve.com | | http://www.gamestruth.com/Hugh/ | | Please note new web page address | | Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math. | [------------------------------oOo-----------------------------]
Outlook will show you the information, but you must double click on the message to bring it up in its own window, or show a different set of fields under your main Inbox window pane. --Sean