> Something that's come up a time or two and has come up again... > > We've got a proposal for a game from somebody that's already running a > game. I tend to want to say that one game ought to be enough > for anybody, > but there are GM's out there running three or four games at a time. > > Considering the level of quality that the Phoenyx wants to > maintain, I'd > prefer GM's to run only one game at a time. But if we refuse them a > second list, they're likely to run off to Yahoo and start a > second game > there anyway. > > Karen's inclined to let them run multiple games, provided that they're > doing well with the existing one(s). I'm not sure I like it, > but I don't > see that we can control it. > > Any thoughts on the matter? I'm fairly confident that we can't control this, because, as you said, they'll go somewhere else to run the game... and... if they go somewhere else for the 2nd game, they might be inclined to leave with their first game. My thought would be that perhaps we should allow this on a case-by-case basis and keep an eye on things. If the 1st game starts to seriously suffer, then we should ask the GM to reconsider having 2+ games. Also, I'd suggest that we shouldn't allow new GM's to run 2+ games. Ask them to have the 1st one for a while and then add a 2nd later. -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners
