Home | Forum | Unread | Sign in | Sign in | Beta? | Wiki
The Phoenyx
your roleplaying community

news > managers > main

Discussion, mostly technical, about running Phoenyx groups goes here. Hypotheticals and wishlists go in stakeholders.
Subscribe | Unread | Recent | Group options | Topic options | Post
KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Sat

Jul 7
2001

03:00Z

Chat fallout - part 1

First off, some backstory, then the question.  It's kind of important, 
so if you're busy, at least scroll to the bottom and look at the 
question.  And answer it, darnitall.

Way back when, when the Phoenyx first got a web site, each 
game had a page.  Yeah, *a* page.  A few had more, but this was 
back in the olden days, and nobody was web-savvy.  I built these 
pages, for the most part, off of a text file that I required.  That's not 
terribly important, other than to say that gamemasters didn't come 
to us with huge predone websites.

So we built them, and each one followed a similar pattern, but was 
customized to give it a unique look.  (See 
 for a 
couple examples.)  This was cool, and Phoenyx games all shared 
a look and an URL, and had forward/back links so you could go to 
the other games (yes, I invented the webring), and we were A 
Community.

Then I got tired of shuffling the links everytime I added a new 
feature (on the two examples given, you'll notice the buttons aren't 
*quite* the same), so I invented the navbar.  This was nifty, and let 
people edit their own pages a little more without having to worry 
about getting all the button codes right.  And then I started not 
worrying so much about the appearance of the pages (or even the 
content, which was a bad thing, but that's another whole thread), 
and relied on the navbar to let people know that this was a 
Phoenyx Game and we were A Community, only I didn't want to be 
too obtrusive, and so nobody pays attention to the navbar, and 
doesn't know we're A Community, so we're not.

So in the chat, we talked about this, and decided that the web-
based part is where we need to start building community.  So 
okay, how to do this?  Obviously, we need to bring the scattered 
games together somehow... either on the phoenyx.net domain, or 
via graphics and more-closely-woven interlinks, or something else.

Now, a lot of people have their own domains and all that, so asking 
anybody to change their web site is A Big Deal.  So I'm wanting 
ideas, *especially* from the people this would most affect... what 
*would* you be willing to change on your web site?  Or what would 
you *not* be willing to change, more to the point?

Would something like (Karen goes off and makes a quick mockup) 
this: , 
where the gray part at the top is a table, not a frame, and would 
actually contain some navbar-esque content where the tagline is, 
that's just to give you a jumping-off point for what kind of real estate 
it takes up, be an acceptable replacement for the navbar?  Or 
would a standardized template make everyone run screaming? I'm 
thinking something basic, like what Kalyr's got... a top bar, side 
bar, and main content text, with colors and graphics specific to 
each game (or at least to the genre, if the gamemaster doesn't 
have/want his own graphics).

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

MeeraBarry
Meera Barry

Sat

Jul 7
2001

05:59Z

Chat fallout - part 1

[sigh]  I had Fourth of July plans...

>*would* you be willing to change on your web site?  Or what would
>you *not* be willing to change, more to the point?

         Geocities likes to think it's a community, but its logo
         got annoying a long time ago.   (Not to mention how often
         it tries to crash my browser...sigh.)

         From a personal standpoint, I'll start with:
         no frames.
         Can't stand them, even the few times they're well implemented.

         No changing the colour scheme.
         First, it's irrelevant, but phoenixes are hot and firey.  My game 
is cool       and subtle. [grin]  Second, it's too transient...

         [Off-topic note: that thunder is menacing me.]

         I can amend my look to take in the Phoenyx logo on the same place
         on each page, as necessary.  It wouldn't be my first choice.

         I would be willing to have a standard "opener" page.
         (Something like, Phoenyx logo, name of game, more information,
         maybe   something like letterhead/cover sheet.)

         I don't know how to standardize the content unless you could
         maybe have an "ingredients list" sort of thing for each page:
         Number of players, moves, some other statistics... nah.  Not
         quite right.  I guess I was thinking of something like a way to
         find information about a game and compare it to others in
         a quick fashion.

         This would be fun: A way to grab random quotes from
         the archives.  Nevermind.  That could also be too dangerous
         and too out-of-context.  And not relevant to the question.  OK.

         Hrm.  It can't be TOO subtle, and it can't scream "Whoo-hoo!
         Phoenyx!"

         What do other sites do?
         Letsee.... similar colours and page breaks/graphic "lines and bars."
         Frames... loud obnoxious graphics...

         OK, so maybe I am on the wrong track, or maybe I need to
         surf the web more...  I'll have to think about it more tomorrow.

\\ Mb \\

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Sat

Jul 7
2001

16:26Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 7 Jul 2001, at 0:59, Meera Barry wrote:

>          Geocities likes to think it's a community, but its logo
>          got annoying a long time ago.   (Not to mention how often
>          it tries to crash my browser...sigh.)

Yeah, the "annoying popups" came up in the chat.
 
>          From a personal standpoint, I'll start with:
>          no frames.

The evilness of frames also came up.

>          No changing the colour scheme.
>          First, it's irrelevant, but phoenixes are hot and firey.  My game 
> is cool       and subtle. [grin]  Second, it's too transient...

Actually, the notion was more along the lines of "standard format, 
but with variable color scheme customized to each game" rather 
than "same color scheme for each game."  See the oldold picture 
for an explanation (though that creaky old format would *not* be the 
one we'd be using).
 
>          [Off-topic note: that thunder is menacing me.]

Hooray for uninterruptible power supplies.
 
>          I can amend my look to take in the Phoenyx logo on the same place
>          on each page, as necessary.  It wouldn't be my first choice.

I think it's going to take more than the logo.  This'd be a 
replacement for the navbar, for one thing, and include more, clearer 
links to other games.

>          I would be willing to have a standard "opener" page.
>          (Something like, Phoenyx logo, name of game, more information,
>          maybe   something like letterhead/cover sheet.)

I've thought about this, but some people go out of their way to then 
avoid sending people to that page.  (Naming no names, there's one 
Phoenyx game that has mirrored its entire site, so as to fulfill the 
navbar requirement while maintaining the primary site without one.  
The claim is that they just haven't gotten around to putting the 
navbar on the new site, but it's been a year or so.)  Which is why 
I'm bringing up this sort of thing... if I'm going to make 
requirements, people are going to have to buy into the need for 
them, and not try to weasel out of them.

>          I don't know how to standardize the content unless you could
>          maybe have an "ingredients list" sort of thing for each page:
>          Number of players, moves, some other statistics... nah.  Not
>          quite right.  I guess I was thinking of something like a way to
>          find information about a game and compare it to others in
>          a quick fashion.

That'd be the Game Summary page, which we stopped requiring a 
long time ago and will probably start requiring again (in revamped 
form) Real Soon Now.  There's a template for the old version (which 
IIRC still talks about batch processing, which will tell the old-timers 
here just how old it is) at 
.  We've 
thought about streamlining that and opening it up to non-Phoenyx 
PBeMs, as a sort of game registry.

That's kind of a separate subject, though.  I'm not looking to 
necessarily standardize the content, just everything AROUND the 
content.

>          This would be fun: A way to grab random quotes from
>          the archives.  Nevermind.  That could also be too dangerous
>          and too out-of-context.  And not relevant to the question.  OK.

I've been pestering everyone to volunteer stuff for the Quote of the 
Week (see the mainpage), but so far no one has.

>          Hrm.  It can't be TOO subtle, and it can't scream "Whoo-hoo!
>          Phoenyx!"

Hey, there's nothing wrong with screaming Woo-Hoo once in awhile.

>          What do other sites do?

I was trying to come up with this last night, but there really isn't a 
site I could find that parallels us.  I was particularly disappointed to 
find out AncientSites is gone.

>          Letsee.... similar colours and page breaks/graphic "lines and bars."
>          Frames... loud obnoxious graphics...

The colors need to be flexible, since I'd just as soon not override 
the local game's flavor. Ditto the graphics, and anyway I don't want 
to serve up a *lot* of graphics.
 

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

TimHall
Tim Hall

Sat

Jul 7
2001

17:40Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Karen Cravens wrote:

>and relied on the navbar to let people know that this was a 
>Phoenyx Game and we were A Community, only I didn't want to be 
>too obtrusive, and so nobody pays attention to the navbar, and 
>doesn't know we're A Community, so we're not.

I've never really liked the navbar; it's too easily lost in the
clutter.

>So in the chat, we talked about this, and decided that the web-
>based part is where we need to start building community.  So 
>okay, how to do this?  Obviously, we need to bring the scattered 
>games together somehow... either on the phoenyx.net domain, or 
>via graphics and more-closely-woven interlinks, or something else.
>
>Now, a lot of people have their own domains and all that, so asking 
>anybody to change their web site is A Big Deal.  So I'm wanting 
>ideas, *especially* from the people this would most affect... what 
>*would* you be willing to change on your web site? 

I have no problem with making the links to the Phoenyx much more
prominent on all game-related pages, but wouldn't be happy with a
standardised look and feel imposed across all pages.

> Or what would 
>you *not* be willing to change, more to the point?

Since I'm one of the people with a domain, changing domain name is one
thing I'm not willing to change.

One issue I have is that my kalyr.com pages also support my other game
on dreamlyrics.com (which I wanted to move to the phoenyx when RPGAMES
imploded, but the players balked).  Therefore a any ban on links to
'rival' gaming communities is a no-no.

>Would something like (Karen goes off and makes a quick mockup) 
>this: , 
>where the gray part at the top is a table, not a frame, and would 
>actually contain some navbar-esque content where the tagline is, 
>that's just to give you a jumping-off point for what kind of real estate 
>it takes up, be an acceptable replacement for the navbar?  Or 
>would a standardized template make everyone run screaming? I'm 
>thinking something basic, like what Kalyr's got... a top bar, side 
>bar, and main content text, with colors and graphics specific to 
>each game (or at least to the genre, if the gamemaster doesn't 
>have/want his own graphics).

I vote for a navbar-replacement rather than a standardised template.  

For a start not all my pages have the same format - I have the side
bar on the 'index' pages, and it's not on the 'content' pages, which
were designed to be a bit more printer-friendly.

What about the banner exchange?  Have you considered merging that with
the navtable (which will mean all the banners being the same size,
which they currently aren't).

And finally - any change of arranging some future chats at a more
europe-friendly time?
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

CarlCravens
Carl D Cravens

Sat

Jul 7
2001

21:54Z

Alternate chat times

On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Tim Hall wrote:

> And finally - any change of arranging some future chats at a more
> europe-friendly time?

Let's see... if you were in Great Britain, that would put you... six hours
ahead of us.  So our 20:30 CDT chat is 02:30 the next morning in Western
Europe.  So to sync up, we have to do an early-afternoon CDT chat to get
you in the evening.  Say, 12:00 CDT, making it 18:00 BST, and 10:00 on the
West coast of the US?

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

TimHall
Tim Hall

Sat

Jul 7
2001

22:06Z

Alternate chat times

raven@phoenyx.net wrote:

>Let's see... if you were in Great Britain, that would put you... six hours
>ahead of us.  So our 20:30 CDT chat is 02:30 the next morning in Western
>Europe.

In Britain, Ireland and Portugal - the rest of Europe is another hour
ahead.

>  So to sync up, we have to do an early-afternoon CDT chat to get
>you in the evening.  Say, 12:00 CDT, making it 18:00 BST, and 10:00 on the
>West coast of the US?

Something like that.  The 8-hour difference between Pacific time and
Greenwich time is the killer.  (I guess this makes it difficult to
schedule such things at times other than weekends).

Do we have any Phoenyx GMs in other timezones further east?
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Mon

Jul 9
2001

01:42Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 7 Jul 2001, at 12:40, Tim Hall wrote:

> I've never really liked the navbar; it's too easily lost in the
> clutter.

It was supposed to be unobtrusive.  Which is good, and bad.
 
> Since I'm one of the people with a domain, changing domain name is one
> thing I'm not willing to change.

There are a number of problems with that, yeah.  Even somebody 
that has, say, Geocities hosting their pages is potentially going to 
have a problem moving here, if they've been around long enough to 
get bookmarked and whatnot.

People with their own domains would actually be *easier* to deal 
with in some scenarios, provided they'd let us do the hosting.  
(That'd be the scenarios in which the Phoenyx generates pages off 
a template.)
 
> One issue I have is that my kalyr.com pages also support my other game
> on dreamlyrics.com (which I wanted to move to the phoenyx when RPGAMES
> imploded, but the players balked).  Therefore a any ban on links to
> 'rival' gaming communities is a no-no.

I don't much care for banning that sort of thing, being as how (1) we 
really don't have many direct "rivals," and (2) denying their 
existence isn't going to accomplish much anyway.

One thing we mentioned in the chat would be that we'd change our 
outlook from "recruiting new games" to "recruiting/uplifting new staff 
members, some of whom will be gamemasters."  With that 
viewpoint, we'd be cutting back on the number of gamemasters 
we'd accept who are one-foot-in, one-foot-out.  You're a peculiar 
exception to that in that you've really got two different *types* of 
game, medium-wise, and we can't really say "move your web-
based game over here" when we haven't got a web-based game 
area.  We will soon enough, though I'm still fine with grandfathering 
existing games/gamemasters.

> I vote for a navbar-replacement rather than a standardised template.  

The standardized template would be a big wrapper around the rest 
of the HTML in the example I gave, so it really wouldn't affect the 
internal workings of anyone's page.
 
> For a start not all my pages have the same format - I have the side
> bar on the 'index' pages, and it's not on the 'content' pages, which
> were designed to be a bit more printer-friendly.

There brings up another issue; how many pages this would affect.  
I don't foresee requiring people to put the wrapper around everything 
including their internal bookmarks page.

> What about the banner exchange?  Have you considered merging that with
> the navtable (which will mean all the banners being the same size,
> which they currently aren't).

The banner exchange is currently going to mutate, yeah, but I'm 
not going to enforce it as part of the navbar.  I don't like banner ads 
much.

> And finally - any change of arranging some future chats at a more
> europe-friendly time?

What kind of gamer geek are you, that you're not online at oh-dark-
thirty?

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

TimHall
Tim Hall

Mon

Jul 9
2001

06:35Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Karen Cravens wrote:

>> For a start not all my pages have the same format - I have the side
>> bar on the 'index' pages, and it's not on the 'content' pages, which
>> were designed to be a bit more printer-friendly.
>
>There brings up another issue; how many pages this would affect.  
>I don't foresee requiring people to put the wrapper around everything 
>including their internal bookmarks page.

There's about 35 game-related pages now, mostly devoted to expanding
world background.

There's a lot of completely non-rpg stuff on the site as well; I'm not
sure you really want a phoenyx navbar-replacement on
www.kalyr.com/music/bandomat.htm or www.kalyr.com/railways/bls.htm
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Tue

Jul 10
2001

02:04Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 9 Jul 2001, at 1:35, Tim Hall wrote:

> There's a lot of completely non-rpg stuff on the site as well; I'm not
> sure you really want a phoenyx navbar-replacement on
> www.kalyr.com/music/bandomat.htm or www.kalyr.com/railways/bls.htm

No, and I'm not even sure I want a navbar-replacement on *every* 
game-related site.  Even though the navbar is going to be vastly 
simplified, down to just the buttons people actually use.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Games: 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Tue

Jul 10
2001

02:14Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 9 Jul 2001, at 17:25, Jonathan Walton wrote:

> Can't geocities/etc. hook them up with webpage forwarding?  Can't they have 
> a page there that links to the stuff at the Phoenix?  Can't they whip up 
> some auto-forwarding Javascript (or get someone to do it for them)?  Is 
> this really that big of a problem?

Webpage forwarding is only so-so, and you end up having to do it 
forever.  (If you doubt, do a search for links to 
"http://www2.southwind.net/~phoenyx" and realize that that site's 
been defunct for five years or so... heck, Yahoo only changed it 
this year...

But really, moving the web pages is not something I'm particularly 
hung up on, except in cases where the host is an active problem 
(say, egregious interstitials and pop-behinds).

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Games: 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

MJasonKnight
M. Jason Knight

Mon

Jul 9
2001

02:37Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 6 Jul 01, at 22:00, Karen Cravens wrote:



Re web stuff.  Am biased, since Westwind started and ended as a 
phoenyx.net-based page, and there was never any inclination to 
move it elsewhere.  So I think games should have home pages on 
the Phoenyx, even if the game /world/ has a page somewhere else.

I thought the profile page was a step that direction.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

TimHall
Tim Hall

Mon

Jul 9
2001

06:39Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Jason Knight wrote:

>Re web stuff.  Am biased, since Westwind started and ended as a 
>phoenyx.net-based page, and there was never any inclination to 
>move it elsewhere.  So I think games should have home pages on 
>the Phoenyx, even if the game /world/ has a page somewhere else.

More or less what Kalyr has got, although the all phoenyx.net page has
is some flavour text (culled from the game itself), the game summary
based on ye olde template, and a lot of links to kalyr.com.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

Chuk
Chuk Goodin

Mon

Jul 9
2001

16:04Z

Alternate chat times

On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, raven@phoenyx.net wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Tim Hall wrote:
>
> > And finally - any change of arranging some future chats at a more
> > europe-friendly time?
>
> Let's see... if you were in Great Britain, that would put you... six hours
> ahead of us.  So our 20:30 CDT chat is 02:30 the next morning in Western
> Europe.  So to sync up, we have to do an early-afternoon CDT chat to get
> you in the evening.  Say, 12:00 CDT, making it 18:00 BST, and 10:00 on the
> West coast of the US?

I'd love a daytime one -- 12:00 CDT would be 10 am for me, which is good.

chuk

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

Chuk
Chuk Goodin

Mon

Jul 9
2001

16:26Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Karen Cravens wrote:

> Phoenyx Game and we were A Community, only I didn't want to be
> too obtrusive, and so nobody pays attention to the navbar, and
> doesn't know we're A Community, so we're not.

A Community is a good thing -- I can see that helping bring in more
players/GMs, too.

> Now, a lot of people have their own domains and all that, so asking
> anybody to change their web site is A Big Deal.  So I'm wanting
> ideas, *especially* from the people this would most affect... what
> *would* you be willing to change on your web site?  Or what would
> you *not* be willing to change, more to the point?

I'm pretty flexible -- my current pages are very style-free. (It's all
about the content, baby!)  I'd rather not have to do all my editing
through the web browser set up, so if I had to have my stuff only on the
phoenyx I'd prefer shell access for maintenance.

> this: ,
> where the gray part at the top is a table, not a frame, and would
> actually contain some navbar-esque content where the tagline is,
> that's just to give you a jumping-off point for what kind of real estate
> it takes up, be an acceptable replacement for the navbar?  Or
> would a standardized template make everyone run screaming? I'm
> thinking something basic, like what Kalyr's got... a top bar, side
> bar, and main content text, with colors and graphics specific to
> each game (or at least to the genre, if the gamemaster doesn't
> have/want his own graphics).

I wouldn't mind that at all, especially if it's just a replacement for the
navbar.

chuk

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

MikeStreet
Mike Street

Mon

Jul 9
2001

20:12Z

Chat fallout - part 1

>          I can amend my look to take in the Phoenyx logo on the same place
>          on each page, as necessary.  It wouldn't be my first choice.
>
>          I would be willing to have a standard "opener" page.
>          (Something like, Phoenyx logo, name of game, more information,
>          maybe   something like letterhead/cover sheet.)
>
>          I don't know how to standardize the content unless you could
>          maybe have an "ingredients list" sort of thing for each page:
>          Number of players, moves, some other statistics... nah.  Not
>          quite right.  I guess I was thinking of something like a way to
>          find information about a game and compare it to others in
>          a quick fashion.

I'm with Meera (almost) on this one. From the point of view of someone whose
spent a lot of time over the last few weeks redesigning his web-site - I am
almost ready to change over to the new style, not quite, but almost - I
would find a top bar like the one Karen suggested very intrusive.

On the other hand I agree wholeheartedly, the nav-bar, which effectively
stands as the 'phoenyx logo' on our sites, is not intrusive enough. I would
happily replace my home page logo on every page, which all too traditionally
is sitting in the top left corner, with a logo that links to Phoenyx. But
here's the rub...I'd only be happy to do that if it wasn't *too* intrusive,
and in my case that means 100x100 pixels max. It's a lot to ask to intrude
on every page of a web-site.

I'm not a great fan of opener screens. Far better to have a reminder on each
page of where this web-site's allegiance lies!

The whole ideal of engendering community is fine. But by imposing 'a look'
on each web-site you stifle exactly what this community is meant to
embody...creativity!

I have more comments to make but I'd like some feedback first,

Cheers,

Mike

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Tue

Jul 10
2001

02:09Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 9 Jul 2001, at 15:12, Michael Street wrote:

> On the other hand I agree wholeheartedly, the nav-bar, which effectively
> stands as the 'phoenyx logo' on our sites, is not intrusive enough. I would
> happily replace my home page logo on every page, which all too traditionally
> is sitting in the top left corner, with a logo that links to Phoenyx. But
> here's the rub...I'd only be happy to do that if it wasn't *too* intrusive,
> and in my case that means 100x100 pixels max. It's a lot to ask to intrude
> on every page of a web-site.

Heh.  Tell that to Geocities...
 
> The whole ideal of engendering community is fine. But by imposing 'a look'
> on each web-site you stifle exactly what this community is meant to
> embody...creativity!

That's the paradox... how to make it clear that highly disparate 
sites really do belong together.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Games: 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

PickWall
JEREMY PICKWALL

Tue

Jul 10
2001

16:18Z

Chat fallout - part 1

> That's the paradox... how to make it clear that highly disparate 
> sites really do belong together.

Dare I suggest a webring?  

Jeremy Pickwall
Faedor GM

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

02:29Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 10 Jul 2001, at 11:18, pickwall wrote:

> Dare I suggest a webring?  

That is something I sort of mentioned in the initial post; in the 
oldold picture, that's essentially what those little forward/back 
buttons are.  (And I eventually wrote a script to maintain the "ring," 
and then when Webring came along I said "Geez, like that's 
something new?")

I actually have a webring-equivalent script (because webring itself 
seems always to have been down, and now that it's a dotcom I still 
don't trust it) somewhere.  But webrings have gotten so overused 
and abused that I'm not sure I want to present it in *quite* that 
manner...

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): The Whole Phoenyx
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KevinAUrbanczyk
kevinurbanczyk@juno.com

Wed

Jul 11
2001

03:25Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Hey a webring sounds good

But your going to need  a "subring" for each major group of sites on the
ring

On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:18:07 CDT "pickwall"  writes:
> > That's the paradox... how to make it clear that highly disparate 
> > sites really do belong together.
> 
> Dare I suggest a webring?  
> 
> Jeremy Pickwall
> Faedor GM
> 
> -- --------------------------------------------------------------
> Game(s): 
> Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

CarlCravens
Carl D Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

18:10Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Karen Cravens wrote:

> But webrings have gotten so overused and abused that I'm not sure I
> want to present it in *quite* that manner...

And the navbar still performs the most important function of the
webring... it links the page back to the thing that all the ring sites
have in common.

I personally never use the "next site" or "random site" functions of
webrings... I just use them to get back to the webring homepage where I
can see an index and usually description of all the sites in the ring.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): raven@phoenyx.net
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

18:50Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 11 Jul 2001, at 13:10, Carl D Cravens wrote:

> And the navbar still performs the most important function of the
> webring... it links the page back to the thing that all the ring sites
> have in common.

Yeah, as long as it's clear what the home site *is*.  I mean, I never 
feel the need to click on the Geocities home or the Crosswinds 
home just because there's a nifty site there.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): The Whole Phoenyx
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

MJasonKnight
M. Jason Knight

Wed

Jul 11
2001

19:27Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 11 Jul 01, at 13:50, Karen Cravens wrote:

> Yeah, as long as it's clear what the home site *is*.  I mean, I never
> feel the need to click on the Geocities home or the Crosswinds home
> just because there's a nifty site there.

A point, with the new "navbar":  The old one at least still said 
"Internet roleplaying."  The new one doesn't, and "Phoenyx" isn't 
yet a household word that makes people think of a roleplaying site.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): Westwind (inactive)
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

19:37Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 11 Jul 2001, at 14:27, Jason Knight wrote:

> A point, with the new "navbar":  The old one at least still said 
> "Internet roleplaying."  The new one doesn't, and "Phoenyx" isn't 
> yet a household word that makes people think of a roleplaying site.

It's not?

It's a good point, though.  I mocked it up from the header As Seen 
On the profile page (itself a mockup), and forgot I was scribbling 
over the tag line (which is a placeholder, pending someone coming 
up with one to which we all point and say "THAT'S *IT*!")

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): The Whole Phoenyx
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

CarlCravens
Carl D Cravens

Thu

Jul 12
2001

20:32Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Karen Cravens wrote:

> It's a good point, though.  I mocked it up from the header As Seen
> On the profile page (itself a mockup), and forgot I was scribbling
> over the tag line (which is a placeholder, pending someone coming
> up with one to which we all point and say "THAT'S *IT*!")

I like the "since 1985" thing, except in regards to the Internet, we're
going to have people saying, "They weren't on the net that long ago!"

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): Fudge, Worldmaking, Fantasy Category Editor
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

MikeStreet
Mike Street

Tue

Jul 10
2001

20:31Z

Chat fallout - part 1

> > On the other hand I agree wholeheartedly, the nav-bar, which effectively
> > stands as the 'phoenyx logo' on our sites, is not intrusive enough. I
would
> > happily replace my home page logo on every page, which all too
traditionally
> > is sitting in the top left corner, with a logo that links to Phoenyx.
But
> > here's the rub...I'd only be happy to do that if it wasn't *too*
intrusive,
> > and in my case that means 100x100 pixels max. It's a lot to ask to
intrude
> > on every page of a web-site.
>
> Heh.  Tell that to Geocities...


>>Precisely!


>
> > The whole ideal of engendering community is fine. But by imposing 'a
look'
> > on each web-site you stifle exactly what this community is meant to
> > embody...creativity!
>
> That's the paradox... how to make it clear that highly disparate
> sites really do belong together.


>>Web design has become an art unto itself. It would be nice to have a
common look...but it's impractical nowadays. As I said before, I'd be more
than happy putting a logo (image map) in the top left corner of every page,
where a link to a home page would normally reside.

This would suggest - to the initiated anyway - that Phoenyx is the home of
the site. To the web novices, well....

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

JonathanWalton
Jonathan Walton

Mon

Jul 9
2001

22:25Z

Chat fallout - part 1

>There are a number of problems with that, yeah.  Even somebody
>that has, say, Geocities hosting their pages is potentially going to
>have a problem moving here, if they've been around long enough to
>get bookmarked and whatnot.

Can't geocities/etc. hook them up with webpage forwarding?  Can't they have 
a page there that links to the stuff at the Phoenix?  Can't they whip up 
some auto-forwarding Javascript (or get someone to do it for them)?  Is 
this really that big of a problem?

Jonathan (deusx & atp) 

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

TimHall
Tim Hall

Mon

Jul 9
2001

22:39Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Jonathan Walton wrote:

>Can't geocities/etc. hook them up with webpage forwarding?  Can't they have 
>a page there that links to the stuff at the Phoenix?  Can't they whip up 
>some auto-forwarding Javascript (or get someone to do it for them)?  Is 
>this really that big of a problem?

Much like I did with my old Compu$erve pages after I got my own
domain.  I *still* get a significant number of referrals from the old
site, even after a year and a bit; some people don't update their
bookmarks.

- Tim (Kalyr)
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Tue

Jul 10
2001

02:02Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 8 Jul 2001, at 21:37, Jason Knight wrote:

> I thought the profile page was a step that direction.

It is, and that's something I'm going to bring up in a bit.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Games: 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

JonathanWalton
Jonathan Walton

Mon

Jul 9
2001

22:37Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Okay, last post from me today, I promise.

>Would something like (Karen goes off and makes a quick mockup)
>this: ,

That works fine with me.  Still, that may be just because it goes 
gorgeously with what I already have designed for "atp" (where I was 
searching for a place to put the navbar).  I definitely think the Phoenyx's 
"new cohesive look" should have the navbar incorporated and I like the "bar 
across the top" as an addition.  However, if some pages already have a "bar 
across the top" as part of the normal formatting, it'll look redundant.  I 
think the Kalyr test page you did shows that.  The Phoenyx logo and the 
Kalyr logo are right on top of each other and the two bars make everything 
look crowded.  I bought my own domain so I wouldn't have to deal with 
banners, and I can imagine people reacting to the new Phoenyx bar like they 
would to a banner.  This wouldn't be true for me, just because of the 
formatting of my pages, but we should try for something that works almost 
universally, if that's possible.

Solutions?  I need to think about it more.

Later.
Jonathan (deusx & atp)

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Tue

Jul 10
2001

02:16Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 9 Jul 2001, at 17:37, Jonathan Walton wrote:

> across the top" as an addition.  However, if some pages already have a "bar 
> across the top" as part of the normal formatting, it'll look redundant.  I 
> think the Kalyr test page you did shows that.  The Phoenyx logo and the 
> Kalyr logo are right on top of each other and the two bars make everything 
> look crowded.  I bought my own domain so I wouldn't have to deal with 

Were I to do something like that, it wouldn't be just a logo bar... the 
logo would be smallified, and there would be useful buttons in that 
space.  Although I'm not especially keen on having the first content 
on a page be "external" content.

> banners, and I can imagine people reacting to the new Phoenyx bar like they 
> would to a banner.  This wouldn't be true for me, just because of the 
> formatting of my pages, but we should try for something that works almost 
> universally, if that's possible.

Either that, or a whole bunch of different options, pick whichever 
one fits your site.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Games: lias
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners

MeeraBarry
Meera Barry

Tue

Jul 10
2001

03:31Z

Chat fallout - part 1

 >this: ,

	I liked that, but maybe I would like it more if
	I had versions so I could put it on the side, or bottom, of my
	site (as appropriate.  I am really not attached to my current
	site formatting, but someday I might be...)

	
\\ Mb \\
GM of "The Glitter and the Glamour" since I'm still not sure exactly how
to play with the Listowner tools since my original message got packed.


-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): 
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

02:24Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 9 Jul 2001, at 22:31, Meera Barry wrote:

> 	I liked that, but maybe I would like it more if
> 	I had versions so I could put it on the side, or bottom, of my
> 	site (as appropriate.  I am really not attached to my current
> 	site formatting, but someday I might be...)

That's something I'm increasingly thinking of.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): The Whole Phoenyx
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

02:25Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 9 Jul 2001, at 22:31, Meera Barry wrote:

> GM of "The Glitter and the Glamour" since I'm still not sure exactly how
> to play with the Listowner tools since my original message got packed.

Oh, and as to that, just follow the link at the bottom, and go to the 
first form (User Settings, or some such).

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): The Whole Phoenyx
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

TimHall
Tim Hall

Tue

Jul 10
2001

17:47Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Jonathan Walton wrote:

>However, if some pages already have a "bar 
>across the top" as part of the normal formatting, it'll look redundant.  I 
>think the Kalyr test page you did shows that.  The Phoenyx logo and the 
>Kalyr logo are right on top of each other and the two bars make everything 
>look crowded. 

As the Kalyr GM, I'd probably nuke the existing bar and replace it
with the new one.  A double-deck banner doesn't look right.

Maybe the new phoenyx nav-table should incorporate a game's own banner
somewhere?

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): Tim Hall
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

02:29Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 10 Jul 2001, at 12:47, Tim Hall wrote:

> Maybe the new phoenyx nav-table should incorporate a game's own banner
> somewhere?

There's a thought.

Hmm.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): The Whole Phoenyx
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

TimHall
Tim Hall

Tue

Jul 10
2001

20:41Z

Chat fallout - part 1

Karen Cravens wrote:

>The standardized template would be a big wrapper around the rest 
>of the HTML in the example I gave, so it really wouldn't affect the 
>internal workings of anyone's page.

Does that include the whole  and all the Meta tags etc?

>What kind of gamer geek are you, that you're not online at oh-dark-
>thirty?

One with a job that involves getting up at 7am the next morning?  (At
least till Friday)
-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): Kalyr
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

KarenCravens
Karen Cravens

Wed

Jul 11
2001

02:33Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On 10 Jul 2001, at 15:41, Tim Hall wrote:

> Does that include the whole  and all the Meta tags etc?

It wouldn't have to, no.
 
> One with a job that involves getting up at 7am the next morning?  (At
> least till Friday)

All the more convenient... you would already be up.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Game(s): The Whole Phoenyx
Listowner tools are found at http://www.phoenyx.net/listowners/

MikeF
Mike Feldhusen

Sat

Jul 7
2001

18:47Z

Chat fallout - part 1

On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Karen Cravens wrote:

> First off, some backstory, then the question.  It's kind of important,
> so if you're busy, at least scroll to the bottom and look at the
> question.  And answer it, darnitall.

> Way back when, when the Phoenyx first got a web site, each game had
> a page.  Yeah, *a* page.  A few had more, but this was back in the
> olden days, and nobody was web-savvy.  I built these pages, for the
> most part, off of a text file that I required.  That's not terribly
> important, other than to say that gamemasters didn't come to us with
> huge predone websites.

I think I was one of the few to have more than one page to their game
site.

And I thank you very sincerly for all the help that you gave me in
making it work, too.

[snippage]

> Now, a lot of people have their own domains and all that, so asking
> anybody to change their web site is